Attachment Parenting vs. Babywise

Cathy - posted on 06/07/2010 ( 57 moms have responded )

5,996

37

Not all parenting styles are alike. What individuals do as parents depends somewhat on how they were raised as a child, what they observed in other families, and what they have been taught. Two very different styles have emerged: Attachment Parenting and Babywise Parenting. One's own developed style of parenting will probably fall somewhere between the two.



Theory



Attachment Parenting is a style of parenting that develops an infant or child's need for trust, empathy, and affection in order to create a secure, peaceful, and enduring relationship. This style requires a consistent, loving, and responsive caregiver, ideally a parent, especially during the child's critical first 3–5 years of life.



Babywise Parenting claims that parents can establish a routine in their baby's life from day one and stick to it no matter what. Parent-Directed Feeding (PDF) is an infant-management strategy designed to meet the nutritional, physical, and emotional needs of the baby as well as the needs of the whole family. Two related dangers threaten successful parenting: not understanding the significance of the husband-wife relationship in the parenting process and the hazard of child-centered parenting.



Emotional Responsiveness



(AP)Being emotionally responsive to your baby's emotional needs is the cornerstone to Attachment Parenting. Read and respond sensitively to your baby's cues and signals. Remember that crying is your baby's way of telling you s/he is distressed. Listen to those cries and try to respond before your baby has a need to cry. Connect with your baby early on. Connecting is more than just caring for the baby's physical needs; it also involves spending enjoyable time interacting with your baby or child.



(BW)Babies become not only conditioned to being picked up at a whimper but also abnormally dependent on being picked up.

PDF is made up of three basic activities that are repeated in a rhythmical cycle throughout the day: feeding time, waketime, and naptime. These cycles are both routine and predictable.



Feeding



(AP)Breastfeeding your baby is an easy way to meet your baby's need for food, liquids, and physical contact. Breastfeeding has so many benefits to the baby, mother, and our society and is the most natural way to meet so many of your baby's physical needs.



(BW)If your baby does not eat at a scheduled feeding, s/he must wait until the next one. Feedings are at 2 1/2- to 3-hour intervals. Your baby's routine is to serve you; you are not to serve your baby's routine.



Sleep



(AP)In many cultures, it is considered normal and expected for parents to sleep with their children. Only recently has research shown the benefits for babies (e.g., a reduced risk of SIDS). Attachment Parenting advocates safe bed sharing in which the parents are not using drugs or alcohol and have a safe, firm mattress. Although some parents may not be comfortable with the idea of bed sharing, the key is merely being responsive to the child's nighttime needs. (Dr. William Sears a well-known pediatrician and author of many parenting books, defines co-sleeping as sleeping within arm's reach of the baby, though many may assume that co-sleeping means that parents and baby share the same bed.)



(BW)Naps are not an option based on your baby's wants. When naptime comes, the baby goes down in the crib. Crying for 15–20 or even 30 minutes is not going to hurt your baby, physically or emotionally.

The three most common negative sleep props are 1) intentionally nursing a baby to sleep, 2) rocking a baby to sleep, and 3) sleeping with the baby.



Separation



(AP)Avoid frequent and prolonged separations from your baby. Secure attachments can be damaged by lengthy separations between the parent and young child. Keep separations down to a bare minimum when your baby is young and be responsive to your baby's need for your physical presence. Long separations can cause your child to go through the stages of grief and can affect your child's attachment to you. If separations are inevitable, then help your child to gradually work toward them. The ideal situation is continuity of care and having a consistent, loving caregiver.



(BW)The nature of the PDF program fosters relational security. That is, a baby's security depends on her developing relationship, not on proximity to the baby's mother. In contrast, mothers who are constantly attentive by the way of baby slings, shared sleep, and demand feeding, all in hopes of fostering security, too often accomplish the opposite.



Discipline



(AP)Set limits for your baby or young child in a warm, loving manner. Teach empathy through positive, nonviolent methods of discipline. (Ideally, the loving connection and responsiveness established during infancy should continue throughout childhood. Attachment Parenting International's book list contains excellent materials for group discussion on parenting the older child as well as an infant.)



(BW)The authors of On Becoming Babywise assume the reader is family-centered, not child-centered. Parents regard their baby as a welcome member of the family, though not the center of the family universe. No evidence proves that an immediate response to every cry teaches a baby anything about love, just as no evidence proves that a little crying fosters feelings of insecurity.





What parenting style is most suited to you? What are the pros and cons of each method?



Please be respectful of others parenting styles even if they differ from your own!

This conversation has been closed to further comments

Join Circle of Moms

Sign up for Circle of Moms and be a part of this community! Membership is just one click away.

Join Circle of Moms

57 Comments

View replies by

Caitlin - posted on 06/07/2010

1,915

5

I refused to read any parenting books before I had kids.. I figure people have been raising kids LONG before books, and they did okay, because we aren't extinct yet. I kind of just went with the flow when I had my kids. My first one was harder, I had to learn what worked and what didn't work so well. My olderst daughter was held almost constantly in the first 6 months, I slept with her most nights and fed her on demand. As soon as she was old enough, she pushed me away, she was independant and AP wouldn't have worked. My second daughter is turning out to be somewhat the same, doesn't like being in a wrap or snuggli or anything, she likes when I hold her, but not for too long. I figure everyone has to come up with their own style, and since everybody has different priorities and cultures and upbringings, the way they will raise their children will be different. There is one right way, but there are certainly wrong ways, and my mom wasn't great at what she did.

Becky - posted on 06/07/2010

2,892

44

I definitely lean more towards AP than to Babywise. While I haven't read the book, (so I guess take my comments with a grain of salt), from what I know of it, it takes the whole schedule and routine thing too far, particularly in the area of feeding. The idea of making a 4 week old baby wait 2-3 hours for the next feeding because he did not wake up right at the moment he was supposed to eat is absolutely absurd, bordering on neglectful, in my eyes. I also don't like the statement that "Your baby's routine is to serve you; you are not to serve your baby's routine.." While I don't think our lives should necessarily revolve around our babies, I think it is ridiculous to expect this tiny, new human to adapt to our very different needs and schedules. Being a parent involves making some sacrifices and concessions.
That said, I do feel some degree of flexible routine is important. I believe on feeding on demand in terms of bottle or breastfeeding, but once my kids are eating solids, they eat when we eat. (although my breastfed baby still bfs in between when he wants to.) And I do think that fairly regular nap and bedtimes are important to good sleep habits. But I also go based on when my kids are tired. If my 2 year old is falling asleep in his highchair at supper time, he'll go to bed early. If he napped until 6 because we were running late for naptime, I might push his bedtime back a bit if he's still going strong at bedtime.
We only sort of cosleep and babywear. My kids do play on their own and I do put the little guy down when I need to get something done. But I also respond to him if he's not happy about that - if he's tired and grumpy, I'll put off doing what I need to do and cuddle him, or wear him if I absolutely need to get it done.
I don't really know many people who do the full-on attachment parenting personally, so I can't comment on what their kids are like. I would say that my method of parenting is, "responsive." My life doesn't revolve completely around my children, but I also don't expect their lives to revolve around my schedule. I meet their needs when they need to be met.
I probably could use a new method in regards to sleep though, because I seriously have the worst sleepers in the world, I think!

Charlie - posted on 06/07/2010

11,203

111

I lean towards Attachment parenting but am not strict AP .

Personally i despise babywise , I dont trust a person who claims to know how to parent and yet his own kids have disowned him , is discredited by the AAP , his methods have been associated with numerous dangerous low weight babies and FTT , as a pastor he was ostracised from his own religious group (christian) from his teachings ,Gary Ezzo has no background or expertise in child development, psychology, breastfeeding, or pediatric medicine, and holds neither an associate's nor a bachelor's degree from any college.

I think this man is dangerous , how any one could trust a man who has failed in his own parenting , faith and is discredited and has several warnings out about his methods from the AAP is beyond me , i wouldnt use his books as toilet paper .

I believe babies are new to this world , they need nurturing , comfort and a safe place that includes having their mother , father or trusted carer available to them when they need , i dont think a baby ca be spoiled , i have found in my experience it has built a very confident , independent son , i think we have created a strong circle of security through AP methods used in his first year of life , its worked for us so thats what im going to stick to .

Dont get me wrong , i dont think not doing AP is bad or harmful it works for some and not others but i have serious doubts about the baby wise method itself and not different parenting per say .

Krista - posted on 06/07/2010

12,562

16

I basically feel the same way as Sarah. I think that it is important to have general routines and schedules in place, particularly for bedtime. But there has to be flexibility there as well. And if my baby wasn't hungry at his usual lunchtime, I most certainly wouldn't make him wait until his next meal! That just seems mean!

I think the best thing is to not get pigeonholed in to one particular philosophy, becoming a slave to it. You have to be open-minded and be willing to adapt to the changing needs (and personality) of your child. I was a bit more AP when Sam was tiny, but he soon showed that he just was not into that. He HATED being worn. If I had tried to force AP on him, we would have both been miserable.

Sarah - posted on 06/07/2010

5,465

31

I don't like either method really, but i guess i draw from both of them!
I don't like the regimented routine of Babywise, I think there needs to be room for changes in routine. I know people who used such a strict routine that they were a slave to it in the end. They couldn't deviate from it at all, else their babies/toddlers would go mental!!

In saying that, I DO believe in routines, sleep routines and stuff. I just feel they should be flexible at times. I don't like feeding routines for young babies, I always fed on demand. (bottle fed)

I never did co-sleeping or baby wearing. Just wasn't for us. Though the kids did sleep in our room to start with.

I think both theories have their good points and bad points. I wouldn't take either one and raise my kids by it religiously and exclusively. I think you need to get the right balance between all theories.
It also depends on what is going on in your life too, for example, with my youngest, she kind of had to fit in with our routine to an extent, my eldest had to be up and ready for school and picked up from school etc.
So I guess she had slightly more routine than my eldest did.

It also depends on the baby I guess, things like CIO work with some and not others (I used my own little version of CIO which worked wonders!) you have to go with your instincts on your own child.

The best advice I ever got was to ignore all the advice I was given and follow my gut instincts!! :)

Good Day! - posted on 06/07/2010

5,888

24

I have a lot of friends and family that did the babywise method with a lot of success. I read the book when my daughter was about a month old (too late...lol) and found I was doing my own little version of it. I breast feed the baby when she was hungry which was about every 2-3 hours. If she was crying 30 minutes after a feed, I assumed she needed something else and went about fixing the problem. She was held quit a bit in the early months, but put in a bouncer when I needed to cook or tidy up a bit. We didn't co-sleep in the sense that she wasn't in my bed. She slept in a cradle. I learned the differences in her cries. Hungry cry was obvious and always got the boob. She learned to self-sooth pretty early on (about 2 months). We never let her cry for over 15 minutes, but she rarely cried that long anyway. She would wimper or cry a little and go to sleep.



So my take on it all? I lean more towards babywise but not completely. Babies need love and attention, but the boob or immediately picking up baby is not the best way to show that love. Of course, this is what worked in my family and every family is different. We have a very happy, playful, curious two year old that loves us very much. So we must have done something right. =)

Sara - posted on 06/07/2010

9,313

50

I don't like either method exclusively, I guess I do a combo of both. I sleep-trained, did not co-sleep, bottle-fed, but I also am a responsive, loving parent. My biggest problem with BW is the feeding. I was an on-demand feeder, and I think everyone should be when a baby is really young. But I also see a lot of AP parents that have real problems with their children being overly attached to them, to the point where it hinders their social development and fosters feelings of insecurity when they are apart. But if you're talking little babies, like under 6 months, I don't think you can hold them to go to them too much. I don't know what is best. I'm sure every person does what they feel is best for their own family. I think it's possible though to take even something that is good too far to the point where it fosters bad habits in an older child.