California mom sues McDonald's over Happy Meals

Jodi - posted on 12/15/2010 ( 502 moms have responded )

20,688

36

LOS ANGELES (AFP) - A mother-of-two from California launched a class-action lawsuit against McDonald's, claiming the toys given out with Happy Meals unfairly lure kids into eating unhealthy food.

Monet Parham is spearheading the suit backed by the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), aimed at stopping the fast-food giant's use of toys in marketing aimed directly at small children.

The CSPI says such marketing illegally exploits children. Parham says the main reason her six-year-old daughter, Maya, asks to go to McDonald's is to get toys based on Barbie, i-Carly, Shrek, or Strawberry Shortcake.

"I am concerned about the health of my children and feel that McDonald's should be a very limited part of their diet and their childhood experience," said Parham, from Sacramento.

"But as other busy, working moms and dads know, we have to say 'no' to our young children so many times, and McDonald's makes that so much harder to do.

"I object to the fact that McDonald's is getting into my kids' heads without my permission and actually changing what my kids want to eat."

The CSPI cited the Institute of Medicine and the American Psychological Association as saying that "kids as young as Maya do not have the cognitive maturity to understand the persuasive intent of advertising."

"Every time McDonald's markets a Happy Meal directly to a young child, it exploits a child's developmental vulnerability and violates several states' consumer protection laws," said CSPI litigation director Steve Gardner.

McDonald's said it would defend itself against the lawsuit, which Parham and the CSPI said they were filing in the California Superior Court in San Francisco.

"We are proud of our Happy Meals and intend to vigorously defend our brand," spokeswoman Bridget Coffing told the LA Times newspaper, adding that Happy Meals offer quality foods in smaller portions appropriate for children.

"We are confident that parents understand and appreciate that Happy Meals are a fun treat, with quality, right-sized food choices for their children that can fit into a balanced diet," she added.

The action came after San Francisco last month agreed to ban promotional toys served with food that doesn't meet strict nutritional standards, following a similar move in nearby Santa Clarita in April.

http://au.news.yahoo.com/world/a/-/world...

Thoughts? Do you REALLY think we should blame the toys? Or should we be blaming the parents who don't say no? Do we need to be more responsible for our choices as parents? What is your take on this lawsuit?

This conversation has been closed to further comments

Join Circle of Moms

Sign up for Circle of Moms and be a part of this community! Membership is just one click away.

Join Circle of Moms

502 Comments

View replies by
  1. 1
  2. ...
  3. 6
  4. 7
  5. 8
  6. 9
  7. 10
  8. 11

Rebecca - posted on 12/15/2010

1,747

6

While I think it may not be well intentioned as a lawsuit, I have to wonder if advertising toys with crap food will start to go down the whole cigs for kids ads path. It may be that Ronald McDonald might end up being more like Joe Camel eventually...a dinosaur of a time past.

Becky - posted on 12/15/2010

2,892

44

I think it's a stupid lawsuit by a money-hungry mom who doesn't want to take responsiblity for her kids' poor eating habits and obesity. I don't deny that the Happy Meal toys are appealing to kids, but so are a lot of things! Maybe I should sue the supermarket because they put their candy bars right at the checkout (which really is annoying, btw!) and my son asks me for one every single time we go grocery shopping! Oh but wait, I know how to say, "No, Cole, not today!" If she feels that McDonalds should be a very limited part of their diet, then she needs to make it a very limited part of their diet. That is nobody's responsiblity but her own.
And as for them, "getting into her kids' heads without her permission," that is what all advertising does!! Unless she is going to shelter her children from all print and television advertising, maybe she should start teaching them how to be discerning and make good choices, instead of blaming businesses for trying to promote their business and make money.

  1. 1
  2. ...
  3. 6
  4. 7
  5. 8
  6. 9
  7. 10
  8. 11