Same-Sex Marriage

Mary - posted on 02/11/2011 ( 54 moms have responded )

3,348

31

119

My state is currently in the process of debating legislation that would legalize same-sex marriages. This past weeks, activists on both sides of the issue have flooded the state capital to have their say on the bill, which is entitled the Religious Freedom and Civil Marriage Protection Act. Although similar bills have come before the senate before, this is the first time there are a fair number of senators who support it, and even opponents of the bill concede that it actually has a shot at passing.



My question is not really about the morality of homosexuality or "allowing" gay marriages, but more about the validity of some of the opponent's arguments and concerns. The following is an excerpt from the Balitmore Sun's article about this:





....The legislation would repeal a 38-year-old provision in Maryland law that defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman. The two-page bill includes a section saying that religious institutions would not be compelled to perform same-sex marriages.



But opponents said those protections are inadequate. They say the bill would do nothing to shield businesses or individuals who want to steer clear of aiding such ceremonies.



Senate Minority Leader Nancy Jacobs gave the example of a small wedding cake business that might not want to provide confections for a gay marriage. Another example was a hypothetical court clerk whose religious convictions might make him or her unable to issue a marriage certificate to a gay couple...




I'm fine with allowing churches the ability to refuse to conduct these ceremonies, but saying that a court clerk should have the right to refuse to do their job and issue a marriage license because it offends his/her morality??? What if her morality is also offended by interracial marriages, or a marriage where one partner is divorced?



I'm left wondering why a state senator thinks it is "okay" for a state employee to refuse to provide any service to a resident just because their personal religious convictions may conflict with who or what that resident is.



http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/marylan...,0,1140373.story

If you see this, leave this form field blank.
Powered by RESPECT not THUMPS

54 Comments

View replies by

Joanna - posted on 02/11/2011

2,096

19

134

Those people should find a new line of work. Judge some beauty pageants or something - somewhere discrimination and judging are okay.

~♥Little Miss - posted on 02/11/2011

18,548

9

2918

This is a tricky issue. I of course believe in same sex marriages and support it 100%. but forcing someone to do something they are morally against I am not for. Yes, it may be with a predjudice heart...but that is what they believe. This to me is along the lines of the Pharmacist that would not issue the morning after abortion pill. It was against their moral beliefs, and I cannot blame them for this. I can disagree, but I certainly cannot force the issue on someone.

Nikki - posted on 02/11/2011

401

37

27

I agree that an employee of the state should carry out the state's business according to the law, not their opinion.

In my opinion though, churches and independently owned businesses should be able to serve or to refuse services to whomever they see fit. The gevornment cannot regulate an individual's choice to do business their way in their establishment.

Krista - posted on 02/11/2011

12,562

16

842

I agree with you. I have no problem with churches getting a pass. But any other service provider, ESPECIALLY one paid by the taxpayers, would be guilty of flat-out discrimination, and should be condemned for that.

If you see this, leave this form field blank.
Powered by RESPECT not THUMPS

Join Circle of Moms

Sign up for Circle of Moms and be a part of this community! Membership is just one click away.

Join Circle of Moms