25 reasons not to circ

Charlie - posted on 10/26/2010 ( 12 moms have responded )

11,203

111

25 Reasons Not to Circumcise



* Newborn circumcision is not medically necessary and not recommended by any national medical organization in the world.

* Circumcision removes the most sensitive and erogenous parts of the penis (the foreskin, ridged band, and frenulum).

* Newborn circumcision has immediate direct risks including botched circumcision, excessive & dangerous bleeding, damage to or loss of the glans, and damage to or loss of the entire penis.

* Newborn circumcision has indirect risks including infection, urinary blockage, meatal stenosis, adhesions, and even death.

* Newborn circumcision has delayed risks including tight circumcision causing painful erections, hidden penis, curved penis, hairy shaft, and sexual dysfunction.

* Claimed or supposed medical benefits of newborn circumcision do not outweigh the known immediate risks.

* Newborn circumcision is a waste of financial and medical resources because it doesn't provide a net medical benefit.

* Newborn circumcision is extremely painful both during and after the procedure.

* The pain and trauma of newborn circumcision interrupts breastfeeding and can even cause the start of breastfeeding to fail.

* The post-operative pain of newborn circumcision can make a baby very fussy for at least a week at a time when the baby and parents already have a high level of stress.

* Newborn circumcision disrupts the normal mother-infant bonding process and hurts the baby's ability to develop trust.

* Newborn circumcision extends the hospital stay for both mother and child.

* Caring for the circumcision wound is an extra burden on new parents who are already too busy taking care of a newborn without having to change bandages and check for bleeding and infection.

* Newborn circumcision places a fresh wound in a dirty diaper; urine and feces come in contact with the circumcision wound increasing the risk of infection.

* The pain and trauma of the circumcision procedure can cause lasting psychological damage & emotional distress including a sense of violation, helplessness, regret, anger, & PTSD.

* The pain and trauma of the circumcision procedure can create unhealthy associations between pain and sex.

* Newborn circumcision is sexually damaging because it removes healthy tissue with sensory, protective, and sexual functions.

* For women, sex with a circumcised penis lacks the lubricating gliding action that the foreskin provides. This can cause vaginal dryness, lack of orgasm through intercourse, and vaginal pain (these conditions are often misdiagnosed as being problems with *her* sexual response).

* Because circumcision decreases sensation for men, circumcised men may be less willing to use a condom.

* Because a circumcised penis lacks the lubricating gliding action that the foreskin provides, circumcision creates or increases the need for artificial lubrication for intercourse and masturbation.

* Living without a foreskin can be uncomfortable because the glans is exposed to cold and rubs against clothing.

* Over time, a glans exposed by circumcision can become thickened and keratinized, further decreasing sexual sensation (this is particularly problematic in older men and can lead to ED).

* Newborn circumcision violates a person's right to bodily integrity and freedom of choice about his body.

* Newborn circumcision violates a person's freedom of religious choice about circumcision.

* Removing healthy tissue without absolute medical necessity from a person who cannot give consent is unethical.



http://www.coloradonocirc.org/reasons.ph...

Join Circle of Moms

Sign up for Circle of Moms and be a part of this community! Membership is just one click away.

Join Circle of Moms

12 Comments

View replies by

Carmel - posted on 04/24/2012

41

6

I was against routine circumcision just after birth because I understood it was done without an anaesthetic and because of the risks of infection and/or a botched operation. It seems now that there are a lot more compelling reasons not to have it done except in very rare cases. The only lasting effect I knew of in adult men was possible loss of sensation (excluding the cases where the operation was botched) but there are so many other things to consider. I agree that it should be left up to the individual to have it done later in life if they really want to. They can then make informed consent. Parents should also be given the proper information so they are aware of the side effects that occur with circumcision and can make an informed choice. Lastly, boys would not be born with a foreskin if it didn't serve a useful purpose in life.

Jessica - posted on 07/08/2011

547

0

This is the first post I have seen bearing information like this.... though I have seen many ask why it is there. I knew and my boys are intact. If nature didn't want the foreskin to stay then it would fall off. furthermore, if my sons want to get circed when they become adults, then they are free to. I will not make that decision when i know full well what it could do and what the foreskins purpose is.

Jay - posted on 05/12/2011

19

0

we have both agreed not to have our son circ thanx to this post and the website... thanx xxxxxxx

Erin - posted on 05/03/2011

6,569

25

I hope this information helps Jane. I can't imagine being in your position, but know I would fight tooth and nail to protect my son :( Good luck!

Vanessa - posted on 10/30/2010

40

25

My main reason is the very basic one, it's my son, that doesn't mean i own him or his body, and it certainly doesn't mean i own the right to make unnecessary cosmetic changes to his body.

Charlie - posted on 10/28/2010

11,203

111

There are several studies done with MRI that show physical proof of permanent changes in the brain during and after circumcision .

Nicole - posted on 10/28/2010

49

2

My husband and I talked a lot about this when we found out we were having a boy (now 15 months). After speaking with different doctors, learning about the procedure and reading information from both camps, we made our decision. He was circumcised about a week after he was born. I'm very interested in the psychological factors that accompany circumcision but I am also skeptical about how much weight can be assigned to them.

Erin - posted on 10/27/2010

6,569

25

Exactly. No awareness of the functions of the foreskin means it's easy to justify cutting it off 'just in case'.

Minnie - posted on 10/27/2010

7,075

9

I don't think they comprehend that there is 100% probability of risk with circumcision. Because they'e always told it's 'just a piece of skin' like a skin tag, something unimportant :/.

Amie - posted on 10/26/2010

6,596

20

That's the problem, parents (and people in general) usually just sign a standard consent form for whichever procedure they are doing. You accept the risks, etc. etc. etc.

Are all the risks and potential outcomes always given though?

Erin - posted on 10/26/2010

6,569

25

You know, even without the moral issues of bodily autonomy, it baffles me that all of this physiological information is ignored. And that's where the process of informed consent fails. If parents had to sign off on all of these risks before committing to the procedure, surely more would opt to leave their sons intact.