double jeopardy..good or bad..

Tah - posted on 08/04/2011 ( 3 moms have responded )

7,412

22

share this story
945372531,745 A Vermont citizen who was acquitted of killing a coworker in 2004, recently contacted police and allegedly confessed. Get Crime Alerts
Sign Up
Submit this storydigg reddit stumble In 2004, Isaac Turnbaugh of Vermont was acquitted of killing his coworker. Police say he recently contacted them, however, and confessed to the murder. But there's not much they can do.

Some might call it an outrage, but he's protected under a basic Fifth Amendment concept better known as "double jeopardy," and prosecutors say their hands are tied.

"He could have turned over a video tape of him committing the murder and it wouldn't change the fact that double jeopardy is attached," Vermont Attorney General William Sorrell told The Huffington Post. "We had our chance. The jury acquitted him and, just in the same way OJ could confess today to his wife's murder, it wouldn’t affect what could be done to him."

Turnbaugh, now 28, stood trial in 2004 on a charge of first-degree murder in the shooting death of Declan Lyons, 24. The two men were coworkers at the restaurant American Flatbread in Waitsfield, a town located about 20 miles southwest of Montpelier, Vt.

Lyons, engaged and expecting his first child, was found dead outside the restaurant on April 12, 2002. He had been mixing sauce in an outdoor cauldron when witnesses inside the restaurant heard a loud popping noise. WPTZ reported that, when the waitresses went outside to investigate, they found an unresponsive Lyons on the ground with a gaping head wound.

Police had no suspects in the case until the following month, when Turnbaugh went to a party and allegedly told six friends that he had shot Lyons. One of the friends told Turnbaugh's mother and she reportedly contacted the police.

"The whole reason he was charged was because he was sitting around the campfire with friends taking mushrooms and, amidst some sort of schizophrenic break, he confessed to this shooting, to being responsible for [the terrorist attacks of] 9/11 and an assortment of other things," Turnbaugh's former attorney, Kurt Hughes, told HuffPost.


During police questioning, Turnbaugh denied killing Declan Lyons and said he considered him a "really good buddy."

Friends also described Turnbaugh and Lyons as good friends, which made it difficult to establish a motive.

"All of us can't fathom why this would have happened," former co-worker Jen Moffroid told WPTZ in August 2002.

"Not a lot of bad vibes. Not a lot of animosity . . . You don't know what to believe and we're just trusting in the system and hoping that the police and courts can figure out what really happened here. We all would really like to know what really happened."

Hughes said the case was extraordinary, in that he had easy access to Lyons' coworkers and friends -- a rare convenience for a suspect's defense.

"They all loved Isaac as much as they loved the victim. It was unlike anything I had been involved in before," he said.

Following his arrest, Turnbaugh was diagnosed with a serious mental illness. The case did not go to court for roughly two years. When it did, Turnbaugh's lawyer argued that his client was ill and said that the FBI was unable to establish that a rifle belonging to his client was the murder weapon.

According to WCAX, prosecutors never denied that they did not have a motive for the crime, but were hoping that lies Turnbaugh had told police -- as well as his confession at the party -- would help them to prove premeditated murder.

On April 6, 2004, after five hours of deliberation, jurors found Turnbaugh not guilty of murder.

Sorrell said that he was surprised by the verdict.

"We had these admissions from him, but he had a very good lawyer who was able to raise reasonable doubt that if you couldn't believe that he was involved with 9/11, then you couldn't believe that he was involved in this murder," the Vermont attorney general said. "The jury did its job. We gave it our best shot. Our justice system isn't always perfect, but it is darn good."

In the month after he was found innocent, Turnbaugh found himself in hot water with police following a 7-hour standoff in which he was involved. Other than that, he has kept a relatively low profile. That is, until he contacted police in Montpelier recently and allegedly confessed to killing Declan Lyons. There is, however, nothing police can do about it.

According to Anne Bremner, a Seattle attorney and legal analyst, the double jeopardy clause forbids authorities from trying Turnbaugh again for murder in this case.

"The framers of the Constitution wanted to preclude government harassment of citizens via successive and potentially harassing prosecutions," Bremner explained to HuffPost.

"Let's take Casey Anthony's case," Bremner continued. "Even if she confesses to Barbara Walters, Oprah, or Larry Flynt, for that matter, double jeopardy would preclude charging or prosecuting her again."

Once again, attorneys on both sides are in disagreement about the alleged confession.

"He's mentally ill. He made similar so-called confessions before the trial, so it's nothing new. It's part of his illness [and] it sounds like he's having a relapse of some sort," Hughes said.

Sorrell, on the other hand, believes Turnbaugh's alleged confession.

"He gave some details this time that were consistent with evidence in the case," Sorrell said. "Clearly, the victim had a head wound, but the police were never able to find any bullet or bullet fragments enough to do any ballistics, so we did not have evidence of any particular caliber or any particular gun. We believed it was a high-powered rifle, and we knew that Isaac Turnbaugh owned a 30-30 rifle. So, this time, he did say he shot him in the head with the 30-30.”

There have been speculation and rumors that authorities could go after Turnbaugh on other potential charges such as perjury, but Sorrell said the defendant did not testify on his own behalf, so perjury is out of the question. Besides that, the statute of limitations is up and "that's not what we're looking to do here," he said.

A civil suit is also unlikely, the attorney general said.

"Quite frankly, I'm not sure that the victim's family would be looking for monetary reward," Sorrell said. "[Secondly], even if they got a verdict for a hundred million dollars, I'm not sure they would be in a position to collect a dime from Isaac Turnbaugh."

Police have not talked to Turnbaugh since his alleged confession. He did not respond to an interview request from The Huffington Post.

According to Sorrell, authorities still believe Turnbaugh is the killer, and do not plan to re-open the case.

"It's just a terrible tragedy," he said. "But, he has to live with what, in fact, he has done."



i don't know..on the one hand i don't think the system should be able to take someone to court over and over again until they get it right, but i also don't beleive that someone who was acquitted should be able to call the police department and say, btw that murder i was acquitted of..i did it..nanaabooboo either..

thoughts??

Join Circle of Moms

Sign up for Circle of Moms and be a part of this community! Membership is just one click away.

Join Circle of Moms

3 Comments

View replies by

Barb - posted on 08/04/2011

3,372

15

i think if he killed because of his mental illness, he needs to be put somewhere that he can't harm himself or anyone else.

I also believe that if criminals that are convicted can appeal and appeal and appeal until THEY get it right. than if someone knows and the criminal confesses, or some new evidence comes to light, they should be able to take them to trial again.

Rosie - posted on 08/04/2011

8,657

30

it does get to me too. on one hand i don't want someone to be tried over and over again, their name being slandered for something they possibly didn't do-and have been PROVEN innocent. if we didn't have this, it would open a can of worms i don't think any of us would be prepared for. when would they stop? the police and prosecution already focus so much energy into one person that they have blinders on ALOT of the time. i can only imagine how many innocent people would get railroaded by this, and how many REAL killers would be ignored cause they are so focused on this one person. sure the occasional scumbag could go free, but i think it's the price we have to pay to protect other peoples freedoms.

Kaleigh - posted on 08/04/2011

2,781

11

I think that a confession is a confession if someone says they did it then they should be held responsible. Nick told me about this double jeopordy thing and it didnt make sense to me. If you try someone for a murder and they go free because there isnt enough evidence and then they find the evidence that proves they did it and they admit to it and everything they should go to jail. Who came up with this loophole? sounds stupid to me.