Abortion Advocates Lobby for Free Birth Control Pills

Meghan - posted on 08/01/2010 ( 38 moms have responded )

1,957

44

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Planned Parenthood has quietly launched a move to exploit the provisions of the pro-abortion health care bill President Barack Obama signed into law. The abortion business has launched a new effort designed to secure free birth control pills for women at taxpayer expense.

An amendment pro-abortion Sen. Barbara Mikulski attached to the health care bill allows "additional preventive care and screenings" for women to be covered by the government-run plan.

Federal officials are now determining what constitutes that additional preventative care and Planned Parenthood is pushing the government to include birth control pills. During the health care debate, pro-life groups worried the abortion business would push for abortions to be labeled preventative care and that could still happen.

Laurie Rubiner, Planned Parenthood’s vice president of public policy, talked about the move with Politico today.

“We see this as a tremendous opportunity to get no-cost birth control in the bill and ensure that this part of women’s health is covered under preventive health,” she said.

Planned Parenthood has set up a new web site to collect stories from women about their desire for free birth control and using the drugs and this information will later be used to push the Obama administration to include birth control coverage in the plan.

“This needs to be based on science and medical evidence, but ... it is also really important to hear the stories of how women view birth control, the health impact and the affordability issue,” Rubiner said.

“Certainly, we have a very large, grass-roots organization interested in making an impact,” Rubiner said. “It’s a very tangible thing for women and something they will really support.”

The debate will come to a head by September 23, Politico indicates, when many health insurance plans will be required to provide free preventive services coverage sans co-pays or out-of-pocket costs. Until then, the Health Resources and Services Administration must draw up guidelines on what is covered.

The abortion backers are getting help from the sponsor of the amendment.

“Her intention was to have preventive services provided for women at no additional cost, no deductibles,” Mikulski spokeswoman Rachel MacKnight said. “From her perspective, that includes everything from heart disease screening and diabetes screening to mammograms to birth control.”

But some pro-life groups, including the Catholic bishops, will oppose the move.

Richard Doerflinger of the conference’s Secretariat for Pro-Life Activities told Politico, “Congressional debate on the need to cover ‘preventive services’ in health care reform centered on services needed to prevent life-threatening diseases like breast cancer, not on a need to prevent the birth of new recipients of health care."

“Requiring contraception and sterilization in all private health plans would be an enormous imposition on the consciences of religious organizations and others who now have the right to purchase a health plan in accord with their moral and religious values," he said.

HRSA communications director Martin Kramer told the news service he could not say whether birth control will be covered or not.

Conservative writer Ed Morrissey of Hot Air says he thinks it would be disingenuous to include birth control pills in the health care scheme.

"Is the Pill preventive, in the sense meant when preventive medicine got debated during ObamaCare? Not at all. Democrats specifically called out early diagnosis of diseases such as diabetes to argue that ObamaCare would be an overall cost saver," he points out.

"A subsequent CBO analysis showed that argument to be a fallacy, but that didn't stop them from making it repeatedly and consistently during the debate. That never included an explicit argument that lowering the birth rate would be an overall cost-saver, or that it was a legitimate government interest to suppress the birth rate," Morrissey added.

Thoughts?

Join Circle of Moms

Sign up for Circle of Moms and be a part of this community! Membership is just one click away.

Join Circle of Moms

38 Comments

View replies by

Amy - posted on 08/22/2010

141

11

Is there really such a thing as an 'abortion advocate'? I suppose there are people who don't really care either way, but I doubt anyone thinks that abortion is something to be advocated for.

There are pro-lifers and pro-choicers... personally, I feel I fall uncomfortably in the middle. I can recognise the need for such services so politically speaking I'm pro-choice, but ethically speaking it turns my stomach and will never feel 'right' to me (I'd adopt out an unwanted child, unless it threatened my life).

Because of this, it doesn't surprise me in the slightest that they'd lobby for the availability of contraception. My mother, an RN, and who at one stage went to pro-life meetings, also worked for the Family Planning Association here which is the equivalent, I'd imagine, of Planned Parenthood. These are support services for young people and people in trouble, they don't eat babies.

Jennifer - posted on 08/05/2010

3,053

42

Toni well I'm 20 and I know when I had my first sex ed at age 10 or 11 it was done then =] That's about 10 years ago so it must have been introduced after you were at school.

Toni - posted on 08/05/2010

3,671

14

That must be new my school never sent a letter home about sex ed. Although we are going back a good 20 years (dear god I'm getting old) ;-)

Jennifer - posted on 08/05/2010

3,053

42

Toni in the UK when a child is due to have sex education a letter is sent home to notify the parents so I think it's more the case that parents think sex ed is important.

Toni - posted on 08/05/2010

3,671

14

Well you learn something new everyday...I did not know there was an opt-out option in the UK, interestingly only 0.04% of parents choose to use this option in the UK - maybe because they don't know about it. There are plans to make at least one year of sex ed compulsory from 2011 (so when children reach 15 they get sex ed regardless of the parents wishes).

Free contraception helps, I know so many people who just would not have used any had ours not been free - so the STD's and unwanted pregnancies would increase tenfold and create more cost to taxpayers.

Chatty - posted on 08/04/2010

2

0

I agree....Kelly addressed, 'at what cost to the taxpayers'? I think the cost of providing free birth control will be significantly less than supporting large government dependent families which are a result of lack of education about birth control and the actual expense of it. The taxpayers are supporting all those babies in the system that could have been prevented by offering someone free birth control and educating them about the risks of not using it!

Valerie - posted on 08/04/2010

240

22

As for cost, I will gladly pay if it would cut down on some of the government dependent large families we have draining the government dry at the moment.

Valerie - posted on 08/04/2010

240

22

I am pro-life *gasp...but have no issue with provide birth control. I know some people are under the misconception that birth control prevents a fertilized egg from implanting. In actuality it prevents you from even ovulating in the first place. So I have no issues with Birth Control or providing others with it.

I don't see why people have an issue with a mother who would want to know first that her daughter is on birth control. They are still living in the parent's home, the parent is providing for all their needs at that age still, so why would it be so shocking for parents to want to be informed of medical prescriptions and medical attention given to their daughters. With some of the statistics of birth control and smoking I would be rather alarmed at such a nonchalant stance about this pill to teens who often dabble with smoking as well. Just food for thought.

My dad is a doctor and my mom is a scientist, I received a much more accurate teaching of sex from them than I did from my school. Yet they had to go to the school board before we could opt out of our sex education. That is ludicrous. I understand that there are many kids out there who's parents don't care or bother to teach their children which is why sex ed is a part of the curriculum, but if a parent cares enough about their kids education to know what's being offered and want to do something different it should be very simple for them to do just that.

Kelly - posted on 08/04/2010

6

11

I think this may be a good thing, preventing unwanted pregnancy is key....but on the other hand, everyone else could be paying for it....hhhmmm

Holly - posted on 08/04/2010

4,555

13

It's the same here Laura. It's an opt out form that parents have to fill out specially. If the school gets nothing from the parents, then their child participates.



When I was a kid, however, I know my mom had to fill out a paper giving her permission (it was one that had her circle if I was or was not allowed to partake in the class and if the school didn't receive the paper back then the student was not allowed to participate).

Isobel - posted on 08/04/2010

9,849

0

Actually here, you don't have to sign for them to be allowed to take the class, you have to sign to get them out of it. It's a subtle difference, but it's there...the default is sex ed.

Jennifer - posted on 08/04/2010

3,053

42

Here in the UK parents can choose to opt out of sex education too which I thinks stupid. I've always been the type of person who doesn't agree with promiscuity and I wanted to make sure my first time was with someone I really cared about and I hope my own children choose what's right for them.

Meghan - posted on 08/04/2010

1,957

44

lol...I was working hard I guess lol!

Holly - posted on 08/04/2010

4,555

13

Wow Megan! You beat me to it and with more info! :)

Meghan - posted on 08/04/2010

1,957

44

Laura you can opt out but its at your parents decision...they have to sign a paper before you are allowed to take the class

Holly - posted on 08/04/2010

4,555

13

In the US, each state has different rules regarding age of consent. In Nevada (where I grew up):
~ If one party is 16 and the other party is under 21, then it's legal (if one party is over 21 it's illegal and considered statutory rape).
~ If both parties are over 18, it's legal.
~ If BOTH parties are under 16, it's legal
~ If one party is under 16 and the other party is over 16, then it is (technically) illegal, but most people don't throw a fuss if the other party is under 18 still...

In California:
~ If both parties are under 18 it's legal
~ If one party is under 18 and the other party is over 18, it's illegal

Meghan - posted on 08/04/2010

1,957

44

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Age_of...

worldwide age of consent map. ^



here is a map it more or less goes state to state here in the us some like KS where I live are 16 while others are 17 or even 18!!!



What does the age of consent mean?



The age of consent is the age at which a young person is legally able to understand and agree to consensual sex. In most countries, until you reach this age it is illegal for somebody to have sex with you, however old they may be. Sometimes the law is slightly different when the partners are of a similar age, but there is usually still a minimum age below which sex is always illegal.

Why do we have the age of consent?



Although some young people may feel that they are mature enough to engage in a sexual relationship, others may lack the emotional development to deal with this or to feel confident enough to say 'no'. Age of consent laws are there to protect young people from being sexually exploited by adults.

What is the age of consent?



The age of consent varies according to the country and even in different states, and in some places the age of consent is different for boys and for girls. To find out about the age of consent in your country or state, please see our age of consent chart.

Does the age of consent apply to gay men and lesbians?



Yes. In some places there are different age of consent laws for gay men and lesbians, and in other places this type of sexual relationship is illegal. Check our age of consent chart for more detailed information.

What counts as 'sex'?



This, too, is different, depending on the laws in the place where you live. Some places count things like kissing as sexual contact, and other places only count sexual intercourse. You should check out the laws in your state or country.

What is statutory rape?



Statutory rape is the crime that someone can be charged with if they have sex with a person who has not reached the age of consent but who agrees to have sex. Some countries have different names for this. Some states in the US for example call it 'unlawful sexual penetration' or just 'rape'.

What is sexual abuse?



Sexual abuse is the term for an adult using their age or authority over a young person to make any type of sexual contact. There is a difference between this and two young people who are in a consenting relationship. If you are a young person involved in an abusive relationship it is important to talk to someone about this.



If you are worried because you know of a young person who you think is in an abusive sexual relationship, you must think carefully about what would be the right thing to do. Telephone helplines and sources of help in your country will be able to advise you.

Isobel - posted on 08/03/2010

9,849

0

I also think that you can't opt out of our sex ed programs at school :)

Rosie - posted on 08/03/2010

8,657

30

i didn't think it was illegal to have sex here at any age meghan, are you sure theres an age of consent? i'm not positive, but i've never heard of it before..

Meghan - posted on 08/03/2010

1,957

44

thats exactly why IMO americans are blind to the fact that their kids are having sex until it is to late because they just dont want to believe it!

Jennifer - posted on 08/03/2010

3,053

42

That's just madness that you need parental consent to get contraception yet it's legal to have sex at 16. I know that abstinence teaching is quite common in America too whereas over here it is virtually unheard of. I don't agree with teaching abstinence and I'm grateful for the sex education I recieved.

Meghan - posted on 08/03/2010

1,957

44

yes 16 is the legal age of consent...

Jennifer - posted on 08/03/2010

3,053

42

Ah right =] Yeah plus the pill is much more reliable for girls to use because some boys just don't like condoms etc. That's just wierd though because I'm assuming the age of consent is 16 in the US yet you need consent form your parents to get contraception?!?

Meghan - posted on 08/03/2010

1,957

44

You can buy condoms at any grocery store or drug store here and at any age but most teens don't because of the "embarrassment" factor...

Jennifer - posted on 08/03/2010

3,053

42

Meghan: So in America what age can you buy condoms at?!? Over here you can buy them at any age which reduces the embarassment that some teens feel with going to the doctor or family planning clinic. However, saying that even though under 16s can get contraception without parental consent over here in the UK our teen pregnancy rate is very high. It is the highest in Western Europe.



Generally over here its evident that extra information given to teens, as well as free contraception is not the solution to high abortion and teen pregnancy rates. What the solution is, is yet to be found.



I was put on the pill at age 13 but for my PCOS as my periods were very irregular and heavy. I was a teen mam, pregnant 18, gave birth 19, now 20 but it was a very different experience for me because I was married and we were living in our own home. Sorry for going off topic just rambling now! I'm just glad we don't pay for contraception because mine is essential to help the erratic periods PCOS brings!

Chatty - posted on 08/03/2010

2

0

OMG! That's obsurd.....it's no wonder there's a higher rate of abortion. I was first put on birth control at 14 when I went to my doctor and asked. Thank goodness....and they typically hand out free packs unless they're out in which case, depending on your medical coverage plan you most likely don't have to pay anything.

Meghan - posted on 08/03/2010

1,957

44

You can get it before your 18 but your parents have to be the ones to put you on it. I pay 20.00 for my Dr visit then I pay 40 per month just for the contraception...I wish it was free!

Chatty - posted on 08/03/2010

2

0

YIKES....that's obsurd! No wonder Canada's rate is lower. You guys have so many things working against you....you have to pay an arm and a leg AND you have to be 18? That's silly!

Meghan - posted on 08/03/2010

1,957

44

I wish kids here could get BC without parents consent...you have to be 18 here...perhaps thats why we have such a high teen mother rate...I would have gotten on much sooner had that not been an issue.

Chatty - posted on 08/03/2010

2

0

Canada's rate is half of that, Laura? Where are you guys seeing this from? Interesting!

Jennifer - posted on 08/03/2010

3,053

42

Yes in the UK teenagers under the age of 16 can obtain contraception without parent's knowledge. It's all to do with patient confidentiality.

Isobel - posted on 08/03/2010

9,849

0

Canada's sitting at half America's rate though...I'm tending to wonder if the UK allows teenagers to access birth control without their parents' permission...cause we do.

Holly - posted on 08/02/2010

4,555

13

I already get my birth control from PP for free... Maybe the program I am a part of is just here in CA, but I signed up through PP, they took my income and expenses info (along with my family size) and then I got a teal green card that gives me free services They include, but are not limited to, free birth control (whatever form - I am on the IUD), free yearly exams, free pregnancy tests, free std testing and care, free morning after pills, free condoms, free counseling services (I have taken advantage of this! They have a wonderful couseling program at my local office), and much more. It is great knowing that I can be safe and protected no matter what.

Jennifer - posted on 08/02/2010

3,053

42

Whilst in the UK we get free contraception on the NHS the number of abortions performed in 2004 was 185,415 in England and Wales which is quite high and the rate continues to rise:



ABORTION RATES PER 1,000 WOMEN AGED 15 TO 44

1969 - 5.3

1979 - 12

1989 - 15.5

1999 - 16.2

2003 - 16.6

2004 - 16.9



Whereas in the US the rate is much lower:



United States: 4.0945 per 1,000 people



So going by that the actual availability of free contraception doesn't seem to do much good for the abortion rate.

Sarah - posted on 08/02/2010

5,465

31

I still can't believe you all have to pay for your contraceptive pills!
Good old NHS gives us them for free!! (as it should be in my opinion)
:)

Chatty - posted on 08/02/2010

2

0

What in the hell do these pro-lifers want? My GAWD! Don't have abortions but don't do anything to help prevent abortions? C'mon?!! RAWR!

Amber - posted on 08/02/2010

1,909

13

I have no problem with free birth control to women who can't afford it. Or for it to be covered by an insurance company as preventative. The truth of the matter is that it IS preventative. I find it absurd that people want to fight for the rights of a fetus that isn't even fertilized yet...
But they need to make sure that the system doesn't get abused. I know a few people who can afford to get birth control, but still go to PP so that they don't have to pay. If you can afford it, then the government shouldn't pay the bill.

Isobel - posted on 08/01/2010

9,849

0

Well, that flies in the face of all the pro-lifers that think PP wants to profit from the number of abortions...obviously, this is not the case since they are trying to PREVENT the number of unwanted pregnancies.