Canadians Don't Know Abortions Legal Throughout Pregnancy, New Poll Finds

Shannon - posted on 08/05/2010 ( 22 moms have responded )

1,025

65

Canadians Don't Know Abortions Legal Throughout Pregnancy, New Poll Finds

Ottawa, Canada (LifeNews.com) -- A new poll of Canadians finds they are very uninformed about abortion law in Canada and are unaware that abortions are allowed throughout pregnancy for any reason. That's the finding from an online survey of 1,022 Canadian adult conducted by the Angus-Reid polling firm.

The survey found just 21 percent of Canadians know a woman can request an abortion at any time during her pregnancy, with no restrictions whatsoever.

Conversely, 41 percent of Canadians are under the impression abortions are only available to women during the first three months of pregnancy.

Another 15 percent of respondents think abortions are only allowed in the first trimester and only if the woman’s life is in danger, if there has been a rape, or if the unborn child has severe medical problems. And 10 percent believe women can only have an abortion if their life is in medical danger.

Despite what Canadians think the current status of abortion law is nationwide, they continue to strongly support legal abortions, the Angus Reid poll says.

Some 27 percent want "no restrictions" on abortions and 22 percent want no limits on abortions in the first trimester and, during the reminder of pregnancy, only if the woman's life is in danger, they are victims of rape or incest, or if the unborn child has severe birth defects. None of the other positions offered gained more than 15 percent.

Looking at abortion another way, 41 percent of Canadians say abortions should be legal in all cases while 23 percent want abortions legal with some limits. On the pro-life side, 18 percent want abortions legal only in cases of emergency and 9 percent would only allow abortions to save a woman’s life while another 6 percent say abortions should always be illegal.

Still, Canadians truly support some limits on abortions when asked.

A majority of Canadians (55%) think women under the age of 18 should require consent from their parents or legal guardians to get an abortion while just 32 percent disagree.

Also, half of respondents (50%) believe women should be given enough access to information about different options such as counseling and adoption before having an abortion while 31 percent disagree.

And a large majority, 79 percent, would support provincial legislation requiring health workers give information about alternatives to abortion to pregnant women.

Abortion and health care have been a huge topic for debate in the United States and 44 percent of Canadians believe abortions should be funded under the taxpayer-financed health care system. Another 39 percent say abortion funding should be limited to emergency cases.

Although most Canadians (55%) think there is no point in re-opening the debate on abortion in the country, three-in-ten respondents (30%) believe it is time to re-open the discussion.

In May 1969, the Canadian government approved the passage of a bill that took off the books many of the protective laws the nation had in place.

Then, in January 1988, the nation's abortion law was struck down from the Criminal Code by the Supreme Court of Canada resulting in full legal abortion on demand through all nine months of pregnancy.

As a result, there have been more than 3.5 million abortions in Canada, resulting the death of babies before birth and injuring countless women.

Join Circle of Moms

Sign up for Circle of Moms and be a part of this community! Membership is just one click away.

Join Circle of Moms

22 Comments

View replies by

Chatty - posted on 08/09/2010

2

0

LMAO! Thanks jen...I had a good chuckle....I always dig your perspective.

Jen - posted on 08/09/2010

2,551

1

Under the Canadian system where it is national health care, then the other stores should definitely be required to let consumers know that purple widgets are available.

Jaime - posted on 08/09/2010

4,427

24

Crap! I like purple widgets...whatever they are. lol

Chatty - posted on 08/09/2010

2

0

LMFAO! I did understand what you were saying but thank you for that WONDERFUL anology. I was more asking what you thought about the fact that not many people know that store A sells purple widgets? Perhaps store A needs to advertise somehow or doctors should be mandated to present ALL the options....store A included. I think it's pretty crappy that a doctor wouldn't offer me the option to have an abortion, late term or not....he was serving his own personal agenda and I think it's disgusting.

I really hope I'm making sense?! lmao

Jen - posted on 08/09/2010

2,551

1

Oh I'm sorry, I didn't mean to give you the impression that I was annoyed or that I was short. That was absolutely NOT my intent. I sincerely apologize.

Let me see if I can explain better. Let's say Store A is the only place that sells purple widgets. All the other stores sell green widgets. Most people don't know that Store A sells purple widgets unless they're actually presented with a need to have one. Therefore fewer people will have purple widgets then green widgets because they simply don't know they're there.

This is a dreadful analogy I know but I honestly don't know how to explain myself better. :-(

Chatty - posted on 08/09/2010

2

0

Sorry, I honestly wasn't disputing what you were saying I'm just curious about your thoughts on the article. I just always like what you have to say but you didn't say much so I guess I was just left wanting more. lmao. Did you read over all the comments?

Jen - posted on 08/09/2010

2,551

1

If you don't know what's available, you can't have it. I'm not sure how to explain it otherwise.

Chatty - posted on 08/09/2010

2

0

Jen - I'm sorry, maybe it's just early but I don't understand your statement? Would you mind terribly to explain it further?

Jen - posted on 08/09/2010

2,551

1

Well, then I guess since no one knows about it - there are very few women who actually get them late. Your last paragraph does not indicate when these abortions were done.

You can't have it both ways. If most Canadians don't know about it, that would include the women seeking them meaning there would be fewer abortions.

Jaime - posted on 08/08/2010

4,427

24

I have never really looked deeply into our abortion laws, but it doesn't surprise me that there are no restrictions. As has been mentioned, try finding a doctor that is willing to perform a late-term abortion...that's the real challenge. I do think that there are doctors that serve their own personal agendas when dealing with patients. I have come across so many people that have begged their doctors for hysterectomies or to get their tubes tied and been denied on the basis that they were too young and might want children in the future, blah, blah, blah. Personally, I don't think that a doctor should make that call based on what they think someone might want for the future. If a woman wants surgery to either prevent pain from endometriosis or other reproductive ailments then why not? And if a woman wants her tubes tied to ensure she doesn't have any more babies/or any to begin with...then why not? It's her body...her choice. But this is still widely criticized and many doctors just refuse to perform the procedures. So thus we have abortion clinics and a plethora of contraceptive choices that don't always work and aren't always feasible.

The OB that I saw during my pregnancy and who also delivered my son is an awesome doctor. He has absolutely no issue performing hysterectomies or tying tubes if a woman requests it. My best friend has never had a child in her life and has her tubes tied. Another friend had one child and several mentrual complications thereafter and opted for a hysterectomy..no questions asked. Perhaps if women's choices were truly counted, we would need abortion services even less than we do in Canada now.

Chatty - posted on 08/07/2010

2

0

But I took what he said at face value because I wasn't aware of the laws....he didn't present it as an opinion. If he would have even suggested that it was HIS opinion I probably would have seeked out another doctor who was at least willing to talk about ALL my options....not just the options he felt were appropriate. Shame on him!

Isobel - posted on 08/07/2010

9,849

0

I honestly don't know...I had a doctor who refused to refer me to the doctor who delivered my first when I got pregnant with my second, because he also performed abortions and my GP was catholic. I was pretty shocked that he could do that...I just went to the urgent care and got another GP to refer me but still...ugh

Chatty - posted on 08/06/2010

2

0

I'm Canadian and I didn't and this topic hits close to home.

NOT that I would have chosen to have an abortion BUT I didn't find out I was pregnant until almost 20 weeks and when the doctor confirmed that I was in fact pregnant and I started crying, he said, "Oh, well if you weren't wanting a child we can talk about adoption but you're too far along now to have an abortion"

Was this doctor misinformed or was he serving his own agenda and beliefs. I was extremely upset to find out later that abortion COULD have been an option.

Jenny - posted on 08/06/2010

4,426

16

I've always known about the lack of restrictions and it doesn't bother me. There ARE legitimate reasons for abortions right up till the end. Our low stats indicate that just because they are available (once you find a doctor who will do it) it doesn't mean they are being accessed frivolously. Yay for choice!

Jessica - posted on 08/06/2010

626

26

Man, you sure like your abortion conversations...anyways, I live in Calgary AB Canada and I know where our abortion clinic is, solely because it was pointed out to me on random one day. I will admit I didn't know about the time frame Canada allows abortions, but now I know. Although regardless, like Charlene said I am still pro-choice, just not pro-abortion and there is indeed a difference.

Meghan - posted on 08/06/2010

1,957

44

That is sad to me that not may women know this...who is trying to cover this up and hide it...

Isobel - posted on 08/06/2010

9,849

0

That's a good point Kati, it never occurred to me that our scattered population may have something to do with it...I'm in a big city, so I often forget that not everybody is.

Charlene - posted on 08/05/2010

631

29

i've also heard that there are only a few clinics there and since canada is so big that it's hard to get to the clinic, and alot of doctors apparantly won't do them there either.

Well, I can only speak for my province, but there isn't a single clinic here on PEI. You have to travel to New Brunswick or Nova Scotia to get one. And neither of those two clinics will preform late-term abortions unless there is a serious risk.

No, there is no law against late-term abortions, but finding a doctor to do one would be a hell of a time.

I'm pro-choice (NOT PRO ABORTION, it is NOT the same thing). I believe that abortions to save the mother's life or when the fetus has a serious disease that will cause a short, pain filled life (ie. Tay-sachs) SHOULD be funded by our healthcare system, rape cases as well. Any other abortions should be out-of-pocket expenses.

I don't believe that someone under 18 should need parental consent, but I do believe that they should be offered free counselling services for before and after. Actually, I think that one mandatory counselling session before the abortion would be a good idea, for all women. As long as the counselor wasn't trying to persuade the woman to change her mind, but instead was just there to listen.

Do I think that these laws need to be looked at again?

Not really, because like a couple people have pointed out, Canada has a fairly low abortion rate compared to other countries and it's really hard to find anyone who will do a late term abortion anyway.

Rosie - posted on 08/05/2010

8,657

30

i think that canadas numbers on abortion speak for the way they are doing things. i think it's waaaay less then the united states.

i've also heard that there are only a few clinics there and since canada is so big that it's hard to get to the clinic, and alot of doctors apparantly won't do them there either.

Jennifer - posted on 08/05/2010

3,053

42

I think it's mad that you can have an abortion at anytime during pregnancy in Canda! I'm from the UK and over here you can't have an aboriton over 28 weeks and they are trying to lower that to 24 weeks. I personally could never have an abortion but whilst I believe in the choice of the woman I hate it when they use it as a form of birth control and would prefer if aboriton was only used in certain circumstances such as danger to mother or baby or in the case of rape. But there'll always be abortions and who am I to dictate who does what =]

Lyndsay - posted on 08/05/2010

2,008

19

I literally just learned about this a couple days ago. A co-worker of mine was telling me how her sister is 5 months pregnant and is considering an abortion because her on-again off-again boyfriend (not the baby's dad) won't stay with her unless she does it.

I am not against abortion, I actually would rather somebody have an abortion than give birth to an unwanted child, but I really do think this is disgusting. The thing that really gets me is this... if some lunatic came along and killed the lady I mentioned above, at 5 months pregnant, not only would he be charged with murder for killing her, he would be given an additional count of murder for killing her unborn fetus. So if it would be murder for a complete stranger to kill the fetus, how is it possibly okay for the mother to do the same thing?

Isobel - posted on 08/05/2010

9,849

0

I have always known there were no legal restrictions... there are other types of restrictions though. You can only get generalized aneasthesia and hospital care in the first 10 weeks, after that you must seek out an abortion clinic, and even each abortion clinic (I think) is allowed to set their own limit. You would have a hard time finding a doctor who would be willing to perform a late term abortion if there is not serious risk to the mother or child.

I like the fact that our teenagers are in care and control of their own reproductive systems. I don't have the right to tell my child whether or not she is "allowed" birth control, nor do I believe that I have the right to "force" her to have an abortion. It's her body, not mine.

We provide half the abortions of America per capita...and 1/8th of the abortions provided in the UK...I would like to see Canada provide free birth control to lower that rate even more...but that's the only thing I would change.