Are Black Republicans Sellouts?

Christa - posted on 11/13/2009 ( 32 moms have responded )

3,876

14

http://campbellbrown.blogs.cnn.com/2009/...



By Roland S. Martin

CNN Political Contributor



Editor's note: A nationally syndicated columnist, Roland S. Martin is the author of "Listening to the Spirit Within: 50 Perspectives on Faith" and "Speak, Brother! A Black Man's View of America." Visit his Web site for more information.



If you ask someone who is white to tell you the political party of someone who is pro-life, against gay marriage, believes in a smaller government, is a fiscal conservative and is a consistent critic of the policies of President Barack Obama, chances are they’ll say he’s a Republican.



If you ask someone who’s black and throw in that the individual you’re describing is also an African-American, chances are he’ll be called an Uncle Tom or a sellout.



Welcome to the world of Michael Steele and of other black Republicans.



When I told folks on Facebook and Twitter that I was interviewing Steele last week for my show on TV One Cable Network, “Washington Watch With Roland Martin,” the comments were not surprising. He was ripped, called every name in the book and castigated. Why? Largely because he’s a black Republican.





Yes, African-Americans are loyal to President Barack Obama and fiercely protective of him. Heck, when legendary radio show host Tom Joyner made some comments recently on his show that were perceived as critical of the president, folks called him an Uncle Tom. And Joyner was one of Obama’s biggest supporters doing the campaign!



There is little doubt that Republicans have had a sorry history with African-Americans for the last 41 years. The creation of the “Southern Strategy” by Richard Nixon, designed to exploit white fears about African-Americans in order to win at the ballot box delivered the South to the GOP well into this decade.



Republican attacks on social programs were viewed as being aimed at poor people and African-Americans in particular. The divisions were furthered amplified by Democrats, willing to use race to hype up black voter turnout in order to defeat Republicans.



If you want to get a reaction out of a largely black audience, tell them you’re a black Republican. Black members of the GOP are the butt of jokes from comedians, in TV shows and in movies. A member of al-Qaeda probably would give a black Republican a run for his money in terms of who is more disliked in the black community. The sense of being a turncoat against your race is pervasive.



And downright silly.



The reality is that no political party owns a bloc of voters. And just as I have criticized white Republicans for not reaching out and engaging African-Americans on issues they have in common, Democrats should not get a pass for their ability to depend on black voters while throwing them under the bus if needed.



As someone who has voted for Democrats, Republicans and independents, I’m focused on the issues. Last year, Michael Steele and I participated in a debate at Fayetteville State University, a historically black college. For the most part, we agreed on issues such as education, family, accountability of public servants and community service but disagreed on public policy positions that were more about being wedded to an ideology as opposed to personal principles.



We didn’t get mad or throw stuff at each other. We had a healthy debate on the issues and had a helluva time before the audience.



This is what we all should be able to strive for. Listening to one another and making a determination on what a person is saying, as opposed to depending on labels, is vital. So I would hope that black voters in Texas actually listen to Michael Williams, chairman of the Texas Railroad Commission, as he campaigns as a Republican for the U.S. Senate seat being vacated by Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison. He deserves an audience, just like anyone else.



The day we end the name-calling and personal attacks will be a great one. Then we will have the chance to truly find out who a person is, rather than depending on silly labels that say nothing about who they are as a person and what they will be able to accomplish.



The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Roland S. Martin.





I think this is interesting. I think it shows that Obama probably got more support BECAUSE he's black then he did opposition because of it. I think it's sad that a member of the black community would feel such pressure to follow the "status quo". Thoughts??

Join Circle of Moms

Sign up for Circle of Moms and be a part of this community! Membership is just one click away.

Join Circle of Moms

32 Comments

View replies by

Jenny - posted on 07/14/2010

4,426

16

Sorry boss. I guess we'll have to start a new thread so Christa can discuss her issues with his content =)

Christa - posted on 07/14/2010

3,876

14

Agreed Krista. That's why I originally just left my comment, which I probably shouldn't have. . . . I have no desire to discuss Moore, I don't waste my time on people like him.

Krista - posted on 07/14/2010

12,562

16

I don't even know why we're talking about Michael Moore anyway -- we've definitely digressed. His name only came up because I used Rush Limbaugh as an example of why black Americans might not feel all warm and fuzzy about the right-wing, and for some odd reason, Diane countered with Michael Moore.

Can we get back on topic about the right-wing and race relations?

Jenny - posted on 07/14/2010

4,426

16

I don't "blindy" follow anyone Christa. I thought my posts would have made that clear by now, good grief.

No one should be talking about following or drinking anything. It's counter productive to discussion. Do you have an opinion an the actual CONTENT of what he says or have you avoided even watching the docs because it's "from the left"?

Christa - posted on 07/14/2010

3,876

14

Please Jenny, to say he doesn't represent propaganda but the TRUTH is just laughable. He's as biased in his presentation of the "facts" as Rush or Beck or anyone else you want to compare him to on the right. But if you want to blindly follow Moore as a steward of truth, go for it.

How many times has Beck or Rush been sued and lost for reporting incorrect facts? I'm not aware of any . . .

LaCi - posted on 07/14/2010

3,361

3

anytime someone says "joe the plumber" I'm out.

Jenny - posted on 07/14/2010

4,426

16

Christa, I expect better from you. Have you ever watched the actual content? How many times has he been sued? How many times has he lost (zero)? Let's skip the insults and debate on facts.

ME - posted on 07/14/2010

2,978

18

"There were people who justified what Hitler did.. they thought he stood for the truth for crying out loud."

OMG...Again with the Hitler drama...You do realize there is a difference between the slaughter of 6 million + human beings, and trying to make sure that several million receive the health care they need to survive right??? You seem to conflate the two an awful lot, and it's very hard for most people to see any connection at all, let alone a logical one...

Krista - posted on 07/14/2010

12,562

16

Can one still call him Joe the Plumber when it's common knowledge that the man actually isn't a licensed plumber?

Just curious...

Diane - posted on 07/14/2010

694

18

You said here that Rush and Beck represent Republicans and the culture surrounding them. You said it. I brought Moore up because I believe he did the same thing during the election and still has influence today. You also have the Hollywood starlets who stand up on soapboxes and influence people.

You are so brainwashed Jenny.........LOL

Do you ever think for yourself? The truth? There were people who justified what Hitler did.. they thought he stood for the truth for crying out loud.

I did not think Bush was perfect and many things he did upset me towards the end of his terms. I have no problem admitting that. But you are so duped into thinking that your side....communism, Obama.......Moore are all perfect and should not be questioned whatsoever.

Some people are leaders and can think and research to find the truth.....you just blindly believe.

Moore the working class??????????????

LMAO

How much money do you think this working class guy makes. LMAO You are a hoot. Joe the Plumber represents the working class. Moore is Hollywood and he is out to make MONEY......

Christa - posted on 07/13/2010

3,876

14

Keep drinking the Kool-Aid Jenny. . .

Jenny - posted on 07/13/2010

4,426

16

No, Michael Moore does not represent the left. He represents the TRUTH. Not the proganda GARBAGE I see posted on this site constantly. He represents working class Americans period.

Conservatives tend to favour the rich so it may appear that way to them with their tunnel vision and all.

Krista - posted on 07/13/2010

12,562

16

Do you really think Michael Moore represents the left? I know he has both admirers and detractors on the left, but I really don't know that he is quite as influential as Rush Limbaugh is on the right.

I could be splitting hairs, though, so I'll concede the point.

However, I really don't know why you brought Michael Moore up in the first place. Your original post is about how it is wrong for people to think that Republicans are racist. I offered my theory as to why that might be so. So I'm really not sure why you felt the need to play the "Yeah, well you guys do it too!" game and drag Michael Moore into the conversation.

Diane - posted on 07/13/2010

694

18

Krista......
And Michael Moore represents the LEFT.

I said it is important to look at who an individuals associates are. I am profiling his socialist and communist Czars on another conversation. I am giving quotes and information about those Obama picked to run the government. Why should this not be important? Ayers was a criminal who killed a police officer for crying out loud. He hates America and led groups of followers to attack the government. He should be in prison. Why is questioning his friends unfair?

You talk about unfair. How about this.........notice its not a topic that anyone wants to discuss here. LOL

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/05/...

Black president drops case against black panthers........and goes after so called racist comments from whites.
You talk about corruption..........lmao



Again Obama sides with his friends.

We will see in November won't we? Obamas has never been so low in the polls............people are seeing the real Obama and they do not like it.
Only thing good in his life right now is his golf game. Heard his handicap has been going down. LOL

Krista - posted on 07/12/2010

12,562

16

One thing that needs to be kept in mind as well is this: the political right-wing in America is represented not just by its politicians, but by its punditry. Like it or not, figures like Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh, even if they are just "entertainers" are still considered to be very prominent voices in right-wing culture. So when Rush Limbaugh tells a black female caller to take the bone out of her nose, is it really any surprise that African-Americans do not feel this large surge of empathy and identity with the American right-wing, and by extension, the Republican Party?

Diane, you often say that Obama should be judged for his acquaintance with Ayers, Dorhn, etc. Well, the shoe appears to be on the other foot. It's not fair (just as judging Obama by his acquaintances isn't fair), but unless/until the Republican party seriously distances itself from right-wing pundits who make racist statements, then they're all going to be tarred with the same brush.

Diane - posted on 07/12/2010

694

18

I addressed history in the last forty some years. And I showed that before that it was even worse.

ME - posted on 07/11/2010

2,978

18

No Diane, history should not be erased, did I say that? Or are you putting words into my mouth again. YOU claimed to be addressing R.M's statement, then you gave 7 irrelevant pieces of information because RM said "in the last 41 years"...I don't think that is unclear...

Diane - posted on 07/11/2010

694

18

The Republican Party has nothing to be ashamed about as far as race relations. if the Black population has had problems in the last few years, they only have their selves to blame for a lot of their problems. Listen to Bill Cosby talk about it.
Ford, Reagan, and both George Bush and his father appointed high ranking black leaders....more than any Democrat ever had done.
you bring up failed promises....to people. You mean like Obama is doing today, all his failed promises, like ending the war, sending troops and money to the border?
Republicans do not exploit Blacks, no more than the Democrats do.

It is one of the biggest distortions and myths in American history that Republicans are the racist party. This is false information that is constantly given out by Democrats to make Republicans look bad. Democrats fostered this idea to get the black vote. They did it not because they cared for blacks but because they needed voted to gain the White House. You say I have posted information to far back...so history should be erased after so many years? In that case slavery did not happen and should never be discussed. Tell that to the black community. The fact is by the year 2003...the Democratic Party had not yet even appointed a black to any office, the Republicans had nominated three by then.

ME - posted on 07/10/2010

2,978

18

"I would like to address this statement expressed by Roland Martin"-Diane

"There is little doubt that Republicans have had a sorry history with African-Americans for the last 41 years."


7 out of the 9 examples you listed happend more than 41 years ago Diane...lovely tho...thanks for sharing...

AND...being rich isn't, in and of itself, a crime...exploiting the destitute to become rich and to mantain your wealth, while lying to them about your intent to help them and their ability to help themselves is, at least, morally questionable...people on both sides of the isle are guilty of that...niether has the market cornered, believing that your party somehow doesn't exploit the people of color and the poor in this country is the result of avoidance, or the continuous donning of rose colored glasses...

Diane - posted on 07/10/2010

694

18

I would like to address this statement expressed by Roland Martin

"There is little doubt that Republicans have had a sorry history with African-Americans for the last 41 years."

Ss this really true? I posted this in another community and it got me banned...of course anyone that says anything about Obama in a negative light gets banned there....but here goes.

The topic was....Why are so many Republicans racist?

It usually starts out with money...

First of all people are under the wrong assumption that Republicans are the rich political party.

How many of the top ten richest politicians are Democrats? Top fifty?

http://www.uni-muenster.de/PeaCon/global...

If democrats are for the little guy.......then why so many rich ones in the top ten? They are for the little guy until they get power themselves and that happens with all politicians...................

Dianne Feinstein, Sen. Frank Lautenberg, Sen. Jay Rockefeller, Rep. Jane Harman, Sen. John Kerry, Sen. Edward Kennedy, Sen. Claire McCaskill, Rep. Carolyn Maloney, Rep. Nancy Pelosi, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton and the list goes on and on.

Most of Hollywood are liberal Democrats.........are they rich? Are they for the little guy? Easy to be for the little guy and live at the Kennedy compound or in Beverly Hills isn't it? And just how much does Michael Moore make a year?

To insinuate that Republicans are the rich party is ridiculous.

About racism...look at the facts.

It’s not the Republican party that has always taken Blacks for granted. All one needs to do is to look at the civil rights record of both parties. I did some digging.

In 1865, Congressional Republicans unanimously backed the 13th Amendment, which made slavery unconstitutional. Among Democrats, 63 percent of senators and 78 percent of House members voted: "No."

In 1866, 94 percent of GOP senators and 96 percent of GOP House members approved the 14th Amendment, guaranteeing all Americans equal protection of the law. Every congressional Democrat voted: "No."

February 8, 1894: Democratic President Grover Cleveland and a Democratic Congress repealed the GOP's Enforcement Act, denying black voters federal protection.

January 26, 1922: The U.S. House adopted Rep. Leonidas Dyer's (R., Mo.) bill making lynching a federal crime. Filibustering Senate Democrats killed the measure.

May 17, 1954: As chief justice, former three-term governor Earl Warren (R., Calif.) led the U.S. Supreme Court's desegregation of government schools via the landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision. GOP President Dwight Eisenhower's Justice Department argued for Topeka, Kansas's black school children. Democrat John W. Davis, who lost a presidential bid to incumbent Republican Calvin Coolidge in 1924, defended "separate but equal" classrooms.

May 6, 1960: Eisenhower signs the GOP's 1960 Civil Rights Act after it survived a five-day, five-hour filibuster by 18 Senate Democrats.

And the list goes on......

The Republican party also is the home of numerous "firsts."

Among them GOP presidents Gerald Ford in 1975 and Ronald Reagan in 1982 promoted Daniel James and Roscoe Robinson to become, respectively, the Air Force's and Army's first black four-star generals. November 2, 1983: President Reagan established Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s birthday as a national holiday, the first such honor for a black American. President Reagan named Colin Powell America's first black national-security adviser while GOP President George W. Bush appointed him our first black secretary of state. President Bush named Condoleezza Rice America's first black female NSC chief, then our second (consecutive) black secretary of State. Democratic ex Klansman Robert Byrd and other Senate Democrats stalled Rice's confirmation for a week. Amid unanimous GOP support, 12 Democrats and Vermont Independent James Jeffords opposed Rice — the most "No" votes for a State designee since 14 senators frowned on Henry Clay in 1825.

I think it was Wallace a Democratic leader in the 60’s who was credited with saying, “Segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever.”

It was J. Edgar Hoover head of the FBI who wiretapped MLKing. Who gave him permission? Robert Kennedy, a Democrat.

Now I am sure there are racist politicians on both sides, but to say Republicans are all racist and that the party is racist simply is a lie. IMO based on all the information I have ever read about this issue it’s the Republicans who care least about color of skin.

I can say this with 100% certainty……I don’t think a former KKK member has ever been elected to a high office in the Republican party.

If a white criticizes or calls Obama out many times they are called racist. So if a black turns his back on someone of his own race especially Obama......you want me to think he would get no backlash?

It shouldn't be that way, but it is. There have been and always will be groups and labels. Religions, unions, clubs, political parties, sexes, races...etc. And if you are part of a group and someone swims upstream they sometimes are called out.

But for this author to make the statement that Republicans should bow their heads in shame because they did nothing for blacks is just wrong.

We all label...and we vote according to what we believe and what we believe is important. I will never vote Democrat because of obvious reasons I cant bring up. Some people will not vote Republican because they think they are racist.

But we have the freedom to walk into a polling booth and pull the lever of our choice and that is what makes America great.

Melissa - posted on 06/27/2010

69

15

I've heard many people say this, and I find it to be very stereotypical...no matter who is saying it. Why must groups of people be lumped together? And why do people automatically assume a darker-skinned person is a descendant of an african slave...and therefore angry at white people? There are darker-skinned people in almost every country in the world.

So no, I don't think they are sell-outs. Anyone should be allowed to think freely regardless of what they look like.

Gianina - posted on 06/16/2010

311

1

Totally agree with you Janessa. In fact, one Black Republican said that the Democrats message to poor blacks is to keep them poor, uneducated and celebrate their victimhood. However, if they get a good education, get a good job and vote for Republicans, they are target as 'sellout', "an Uncle Tom" or even 'acting white'.

Here is a Newsletter from the National Black Republican Ass.

Can Republicans Win Back The Black Vote?
By Frances Rice
“Why Is the Black Vote in the Democrats’ Pocket?” That is the title of an article by Juliette Ochieng
which provides an analysis of why Republicans are having very little success attracting more blacks
into the Republican Party. The article can be found on the Internet at: http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/
why-is-the-black-vote-in-the-democratic-pocket/
Ochieng opines that blacks have been trained by Democrats to expect political parties to provide quid
pro quo. In other words, while Republicans want to help blacks pursue happiness (teach blacks how
to fish so they can feed themselves for a lifetime), Democrats want to provide happiness to blacks
(give them a fish so they can eat for a day).
The Democratic Party’s strategy of using handouts to garner the black votes, while working to keep
blacks mired in poverty, was described as “plantation politics” by President Barack Obama on page
147 of his book “Dreams From My Father”. As a result of the politics of poverty practiced by
Democrats, including Obama, the firm belief is now deeply rooted in the black community that the
government must "do something” for blacks.
Democrats have been running black communities for the past 40+ years and turned those
communities into economic and social wastelands with their failed socialist policies. Yet, Democrats
have the gall to blame Republicans for the deplorable conditions caused by the Democrats.
Democrats also accuse Republicans of doing nothing to help poor blacks – a charge that resonates
with victim mongers.
However, since the beginning of the so-called War on Poverty, over $9 trillion has been spent on
poverty programs. According to the Washington Post, in one year alone under President George W.
Bush, over $500 billion was spent on over 80 poverty-related programs, with little movement in the
poverty needle. The problem with black poverty is not money – and it is not the Republican Party.
Notably, only 25% of blacks are poor and living in those dilapidated neighborhoods run by
Democrats. The remaining 75% of blacks are prosperous and living in the larger society.
Shamefully, Democrats consistently fight efforts of Republicans to help poor blacks living in
Democrat-controlled neighborhoods get out of poverty. Most egregious is the fight by Democrats to
keep Republicans from providing school choice opportunity scholarships so that black parents can
get their children out of failing schools. The money belongs to the people, not the buildings controlled
by the teachers’ unions that are supporters of the Democratic Party.
Further, Democrats, aided by liberal journalists and teachers, hide information about black poverty
that is embarrassing to Democrats. For instance, after the Civil War, blacks left the plantations run by
Democrats with little more than the ragged clothes on their backs. Today, the combined wealth of
blacks is over $1.4 trillion – up from the $644 billion in 2005 – a staggering figure that is equivalent to
the GNP of the world's 16th largest economy. This is an incredible, historic achievement.
Whenever Republicans attempt to point out that it is the Democrats who are keeping those inner-city
blacks mired in poverty, Democrats resort to playing the race card, falsely accusing the Republican
Party of being the party of the racists who denied blacks civil rights during and prior to the 1960’s .
The blatant use of race-baiting by Democrats to win the black vote is why any strategy to attract
blacks back into the Republican Party must include not only a focus on economic and social issues,
but also information about the true history of civil rights.
The NBRA Civil Rights Newsletter that is posted on the Internet at: www.NBRA.info provides
information that helps set the civil rights record straight. Referenced in the newsletter is an article
published by the Claremont Institute entitled "The Myth of the Racist Republicans" that can be found
on the Internet at: http://www.claremont.org/publications/cr...
Included in the newsletter are additional references such as "Unfounded Loyalty" by Rev. Wayne
Perryman, "Wrong on Race" by Bruce Bartlett and "A Short History of Reconstruction" by Dr. Eric
Foner, a renowned liberal historian whose biography can be found on the Internet at:
http://www.ericfoner.com/
Perryman wrote his book after conducting years of research and then sued the Democratic Party,
demanding an apology for that party’s 150-year history of racism based on the Democratic Party's
“States Rights” claims. The Democrats admitted their racist past under oath in court, but refused to
apologize because they know that they can take the black vote for granted.
It is frustrating to observe how most black Americans continue to support the Democratic Party, in
spite of that party’s reprehensible history of racism and socialism that have caused so much harm to
blacks. As author Michael Scheuer stated, the Democratic Party is the party of the four S's: slavery,
secession, segregation and now socialism.
At one time in our history, almost all blacks were Republicans because, since its inception in 1854 as
the anti-slavery party, the Republican Party has always been the party of freedom and equality for
blacks. Studies show that today, still, most blacks share the values of the Republican Party. Those
same studies demonstrate that most blacks are very conservative and do not share the values of the
Democratic Party that supports same-sex marriage, partial-birth abortion and banning God from the
public square.
In order to keep blacks from voting their values or for Republicans, every election cycle, Democrats
preach hatred against the Republican Party and get blacks to cast a protest vote against
Republicans, and not a vote for Democrats.
The message that Democrats gives to poor blacks is despicable. If you remain poor, uneducated and
vote for Democrats, we will celebrate your victimhood. If you get a good education, get a good job
and vote for Republicans, we will denigrate you as "acting white”, a "sellout”, an "Uncle Tom”, a
"House Negro”, a "House N-word", a "Lawn Jockey”, and worse.
Democrats talk tolerance, but practice intolerance, castigating any black person as a “traitor” to his or
her race who does not toe the liberal agenda line.
When black Democrat Juan Williams wrote his book entitled "Enough: The Phony Leaders, Deadend
Movements and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America" that exposed the
deplorable conditions in black communities, Williams was denounced on national TV by another black
Democrat as a "Happy Negro".
Brazenly, on the left-wing Internet website called "The News Blog," Democrats posted a doctored
photograph of then Maryland Lt. Governor Michael Steele (now chairman of the RNC) when he was
running for a Senate seat, depicting Steele as a "Simple Sambo" with a blackened minstrel-style face,
nappy hair and big, think red lips. The cartoon caption read: “Simple Sambo wants to move to the big
house”. This contemptible racist stereotype is the same one Democrats used to demean black men
during the era of slavery and segregation.
In addition to other outrageous racist images of Dr. Condoleezza Rice produced by several
Democrats, cartoonist Jeff Danziger depicted Dr. Rice as an ignorant, barefoot "mammy", reminiscent
of the stereotyped black woman in the movie “Gone with the Wind” about the slave era black woman
who remarked: "I don't know nothin' 'bout birthin' no babies". This is the type of racist stereotype
Democrats used to demean black women during the era of slavery and segregation.
Democrats now love Gen. Colin Powell, but spewed out racist attacks on Powell before he endorsed
Obama and embraced the liberal agenda of higher taxes and a bigger government to provide povertyproducing
handouts to blacks.
A video was shot by WKRN Video Journalist Beau Fleenor at Tennessee State University in
Nashville, Tennessee that shows Al Sharpton demeaning Gen. Powell and Dr. Rice, when Sharpton
was asked to give his opinions about whether Powell and Rice were “House Negroes". That video
can be found on the Internet at:

An article that appeared in a Portland, Oregon paper was one of many exposing how hardly a ripple
of protest was made by black Democrats when Harry Belafonte publicly denounced Gen. Powell as a
"House Negro". It can be found on the Internet at:
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2002/10...
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2002/10...
The denigration by Democrats of blacks who identify with the Republican Party makes it nearly
impossible for the Republican Party to attract blacks into the party, and for black Republicans to get
elected to office in black communities. Yet, Democrats have the temerity to point a finger of blame at
the Republican Party for there being so few blacks in the Republican Party and for there being so few
black Republican elected officials. Notably, the few black Republicans who get elected to public
office do so in largely white Republican districts.
Those black Americans living in the Democrat-controlled neighborhoods who want to get out of
poverty should seize control over their own destiny and stop voting monolithically for Democrats who
use “plantation politics” to buy their votes while keeping blacks in poverty.
Democrats will forever maintain a ”lock” on the black vote, for as long as black Americans – including
prosperous blacks who sympathize with poor blacks – continue believing the myth that the
Republican Party is a racist party and clinging to the false notion that poor blacks are “victims” who
need government handouts to survive.
Frances Rice is a retired Army Lieutenant Colonel, a lawyer and chairman of the National Black
Republican Association. She can be contacted at: www.NBRA.info

Janessa - posted on 06/16/2010

444

38

I do not think blacks who are republicans are sell out. I can see why there are republicans because as blacks we ahve to start doing more as a people. Meaning there are to many lazy blacks who just want to live off the government and majority of blacks do not want to live off the government there want better for themselves then what there parents had. The republicans black just want to to better and show other blacks hard work pays off and start to do for yourself instead of rellying on government.

Gianina - posted on 06/14/2010

311

1

Tanya, from what I have learned over the years. It seems that many of the African-American has forgotten what 'Martin Luther King's speech really means, or it was twisted over the years. I could be wrong but I have kept close in reading the National Black Repubican Association.



http://www.nbra.info/index.cfm?fuseactio...



In their frequently Asked Questions, http://www.nbra.info/FrequentlyAskedQues...

I have learned a lot.



Now granted, many Democrats / Liberals would smear what is in this site, which is sad because it's their view and not to convince you to switch. I am seeking a better understanding of the Democrats side, without smearing them.

Tanya - posted on 06/13/2010

1,073

23

"This is what we all should be able to strive for. Listening to one another and making a determination on what a person is saying, as opposed to depending on labels, is vital"

So true. I agree with that much of the article. I am not sure how black people feel about black republicans, but I will start asking around.

Krista - posted on 06/13/2010

12,562

16

I think it is best for people to vote for whomever represents them best on a VARIETY of issues, not just one issue. So if someone is black and shares a very similar set of ideologies with the Republican Party, I would respect them more for setting aside any qualms about the Southern Strategy and voting for the party with whom they most identify.

And the same goes for the other way. If someone leans mostly left, but avoids voting Democratic based solely on ONE issue, then I think that is foolhardy.

Gianina - posted on 06/13/2010

311

1

I know many African-American who didn't vote for Obama. They say that Obama doesn't stand for what they believe. AND I have met many others' who regret voting for Obama.

Traci - posted on 11/14/2009

2,158

2

That's funny, Joy...you must stick out like a sore thumb in those parts! haha

JL - posted on 11/14/2009

3,635

48

I like Roland Martin and this is a good article. I think it is stupid to say that because an African American is a Repubican they are a sell out. I have gay freinds that are Republicans and they have had some gays call them sell outs. Heck, I am a caucasion from the South who is a Liberal Democrat and a military wife and I have had some Southerners and some military people call me a political sellout before. There are Christians who call Democratic Christians sell outs. I think it is all absurd, judgemental, and hypocritical.

Dana - posted on 11/13/2009

11,264

35

Ronland Martin actually gets on my nerves but, this was a good article. I like the overall message. I do agree that it's bullcrap that people were expected (or are) to support someone because of their race or gender.

Colleen - posted on 11/13/2009

294

5

I really like Roland Martin's columns. Sometimes he says things and I'm like, "Right on!" And other times he says things that really make me take a second look at myself and my own beliefs/actions. I'm still mulling over this column; I'll let you know what I think once I figure it out myself!

Isobel - posted on 11/13/2009

9,849

0

Jesse Jackson is not a republican, nor is he an Obama fan. I hardly think that being black and not liking Barrack Obama makes you a sell out.