GOP Blocks Jobs Outsourcing Bill

Pamela - posted on 10/15/2010 ( 5 moms have responded )

1,496

104

The Senate on Tuesday blocked tax legislation that would have punished U.S. firms that export jobs. But the political symbolism of trying to save American jobs, not passing a bill, was the Democrats' closing argument on the economy in the waning weeks of the congressional elections.

Republicans complained that the vote used a serious subject — economic recovery — to score points with voters five weeks before the balloting in which all 435 House seats, 37 Senate seats and the Democratic majority are on the line. The bill in question, Republicans said, would make U.S. companies less competitive.

"The liberal Senate leadership has brought forward a politically motivated bill that will never become law," said Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah.

But majority Democrats, now without their original plan to close the campaign with a middle class tax cut, sought to convince voters that the bill showed off their commitment to supporting the nation's economic recovery.

"This is part of the continuing focus on jobs," Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., told reporters.

The bill failed, 53-45, to attract the 60 votes required to advance. Four Democrats and one Independent joined Republicans to block its progress.

But debating it and forcing senators on the record was the Democrats' point.

"We're just a few weeks away from an election," said Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill. "I wish this election would be a simple referendum on the debate we're having on the floor of the Senate right now."

The bill at issue in the Senate would exempt companies that import jobs from paying the 6.2 percent Social Security payroll tax for new U.S. employees who replace overseas workers who had been doing similar work.

The two-year exemption would be available for workers hired over the next three years. The tax cut — estimated to cost about $1 billion — would be partially offset by tax increases on companies that move jobs overseas.

The bill would prohibit firms from taking deductions for business expenses associated with expanding operations in other countries. It would increase taxes on U.S. companies that close domestic operations and expand foreign ones to import products to the U.S.

Republicans argued the tax cuts would be difficult to administer and the tax increases would hurt international corporations that employ U.S. workers.

"Let's have votes on real job creation incentives and let's get out of this gamesmanship," said Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the top Republican on the tax-writing Senate Finance Committee.

The tax increases total $369 million over the next decade, according to a preliminary estimate by the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation. Combined with the tax cut, the bill would add an estimated $721 million to the budget deficit over the next decade.

The Democrats voting to block the bill were Sens. Max Baucus of Montana, Ben Nelson of Nebraska, Jon Tester of Montana and Mark Warner of Virginia. Also voting no was Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn"

So the GOP (along with 4 Democrats and 1 Independent) blocked a job bill that would have rewarded companies that hire here in the U.S. rather than outsourcing jobs to other countries. A good idea? Or not? Apparently it would have added "an estimated $721 million to the budget deficit over the next decade." But it also might have created more jobs which we appear to be in need of currently. Thoughts?

Join Circle of Moms

Sign up for Circle of Moms and be a part of this community! Membership is just one click away.

Join Circle of Moms

5 Comments

View replies by

Theresa - posted on 10/15/2010

477

0

OK...how can anyone argue that the Republican party is NOT being run by lobbyists and special interest groups, after this? They seem preoccupied with "protecting" businesses and corporations and NOT the American people who they claim to love and support so much! Hogwash!



And for the few Democrats who voted against this...they just revealed who THEY work for...not the American people, that's for sure!

ME - posted on 10/15/2010

2,978

18

Yup...that's the part I was agreeing with...I've been in favor of this idea since the first time I heard it in Boulder,Co, but...if we couldn't get it passed in the most liberal city in the country, I don't see much chance of getting it passed in the country as a whole...

Isobel - posted on 10/15/2010

9,849

0

right...but that would even out the prices globally so that the US manufacturers could compete again without having to outsource. :)

ME - posted on 10/15/2010

2,978

18

I agree Laura, but you don't sound much like a republican...I don't think they have any more problem with the horrible labor practices of these countries then they have with all the lost jobs...

Isobel - posted on 10/15/2010

9,849

0

well...here I'm gonna become a republican for a few minutes.

The only result of punishing outsourcers is that your companies would become less competitive on the global level. Since we know that Americans will continue to buy the cheapest products available...China would kick your asses even harder than they already are.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again

IF you want manufacturing jobs in America, you have to make it illegal to sell products in America that are made without following America's laws (child labour, slave labour, minimum wage, etc).

Since everybody wants a piece of selling to your MASSIVE market, they will then have a financial incentive to follow the human rights laws that our society has put into place.

What people don't realize is how unfair this whole thing is to the developing countries...we made all our money and built our lifestyle off the backs of slaves and child labour and destroying the earth...now that we have all the money and a nice cushy lifestyle, we turn around to the rest of the world and say "no slave labour, your workers need a minimum wage and human rights, no polluting, blah blah blah"...then they say "hey wait a minute...how are we ever supposed to catch up if we can't do it the same way you did?"

not that I think they SHOULD do it the way we did...but maybe we owe them a hand