Is the Tea Party good for women?

Pamela - posted on 09/16/2010 ( 6 moms have responded )

1,496

104

There's no doubt that women are good for the Tea Party. But is the Tea Party good for women?

There is no simple answer to that because the Tea Party is notably short on simple answers to anything. But much we do know: they have had a real impact on the Republican primaries -- including shockers from Delaware to New York to Alaska.

We also know that, contrary to the early image of a fraternity of angry white men, women are the heart of the movement. Thinking began to change with the March release of the Quinnipiac University poll that revealed that 55 percent of those identifying themselves as members of the Tea Party are female.

It is also now clear that women have a seat at the grownups' table. Writing in Slate, Hanna Rosin points out that, to the extent the movement has leaders, it is dominated by women. One example: of the eight Board members of the influential Tea Party Patriots, six are women.

Sara Palin, the movement's acknowledged alpha female, drew a fusillade of brickbats from traditional feminists when she said that "momma grizzlies" like those of the Tea party were the real feminists. When you strip the term down to the base metal of equality without excuses, she has a point. These are women rising up to confront a world they feel threatens their families. They are loud, determined, unafraid and -- politically speaking -- have great big teeth.

But will the results of that determination be ultimately good or bad for all women?

Unfortunately, good and bad, are hotly subjective when it comes to issues like choice, gay marriage and single parenthood.

Organizers studiously stayed away from such division. Reporting on last weekend's Washington D.C. Tea Party event for Politico, James Hohmann and Kenneth P. Vogel noted a determined lack of attention to social issues -- particularly those embraced by the Christian right.

They quote one Maine organizer for the Tea Party Patriots: "... there are a lot of people in this country who don't want religion in their politics."

Politics, certainly in this regard, is about getting elected. Whether the Tea Party women want religion in their government may be another question entirely.

The question becomes more interesting the deeper you dig into the statistics. A CBS News/New York Times poll created a snapshot of the Tea Party movement. Almost three-in-four said they were conservative and almost 40 percent said they were very conservative. Almost 40 percent call themselves evangelical.

Aggregate statistics don't neatly translate to individual intent. But it's fair to assume there aren't many coming out of this base who will champion issues like gay marriage, choice, and single parent families. Gay marriage and choice are clearly high on Sarah Palin's list of American evils. Single parent families get a pass for obvious reasons. But as Colleen Campbell quotes her speeches in a recent St. Louis Post-Dispatch editorial -- single mothers are "strong enough and smart enough" ... to "handle an unplanned pregnancy", while continuing to pursue education and a career. In other words: when the going gets tough, the tough keep the baby.

So my question to the women of the Tea Party is this. If you take back America from the forces of big government, big spending and big taxes, do you plan to share it with the teenage girl who is unprepared to raise a child, with the gay couple who want the simple right to marry, and with families who may not fit your own definitions?

'Nuff said.

Join Circle of Moms

Sign up for Circle of Moms and be a part of this community! Membership is just one click away.

Join Circle of Moms

6 Comments

View replies by

Pamela - posted on 09/17/2010

1,496

104

This whole thing has been frightening on so many levels. Apparently women dominate this movement but history shows that women are often their own worst enemies.

ME - posted on 09/17/2010

2,978

18

The Tea Party will destroy what America REALLY stands for; some will be surprised, but the majority will be pleased as punch. I expect them to take over more and more seats in the house and senate and to make a real attempt at turning our fantastic nation into a theocracy...these types of governments are NEVER good for women...my advice...Be careful what you wish for tea party women...you will probably get it, and you will be sorry!

Theresa - posted on 09/17/2010

477

0

It's so ironic...not too long ago, if you were a pro-gun, anti-tax, pro-life American, you were in the Republican Party! Not any more!!!!! The Tea Party is taking over!!!!!



Barack Obama's win 2 years ago, epitomized "The American Dream" for so many people. Obama validated the "education is the key for success" ethic for minorities and people without "means". The "Presidency" was now an achievable accomplishment, that never was before! Obama's election was America at it's BEST!



For many others however, Obama's victory was a slap in the face! How could this man, born of an AFRICAN father and WHITE mother in Hawaii (is it even a state), former Muslim, with the middle name HUSSEIN be elected to the highest office in the land????



All of a sudden EVERYTHING associated with Obama was investigated and scrutinized and America's WORST came out the woodwork! The birthers, the ammendmenters, the white supremacists and the anti-muslim "fringes" were ridiculed and eventually discounted. So they joined the Tea Party (who insists they don't deal with social issues and was getting a lot of National attention) and are taking the country by storm! How do you think the Tea Party is growing so rapidly and getting financed so quickly??



I think the people in the Tea Party that have legitimate issues with the government, deficit, jobs, and the economy are going to be surprised when all of these candidates that they are electing, who are evangelical christians, pro-life, anti gay marriage and anti-immigration, get to Washington and focus primarily on social issues!



I wonder what movement will rise up to "throw THEM all out" when people don't get what they bargained for! :)

Pamela - posted on 09/17/2010

1,496

104

The South refers to the Civil War as the "Northern Aggression". Never mind that the South fired the first shot.

Regarding the Tea Party, I listened to a white supremacist talk about how the term, frequently used by Tea Partiers, "Take back the country" was actually code. So rather than say, "Jews and Blacks are taking over our country", they say, "We want our country back!". Not all of the people in the Tea Party are white supremacists - in fact, many are not - but enough are.

There are valid issues being brought to the table by the Tea Party - and they should be considered. But at the same time, many of the concerns are non-issues. Like Obama's birth certificate and is he the anti-christ? There is a huge lack of understanding regarding health care reform. The vitriol hurled at Obama is unbelievable - whether or not one likes him, he's still the president, so give him some respect.

One of the reasons the folks of the tea party are all over the place has a lot to do which the fact that I think they don't know what they want. Many do receive government bennies (my dad - who loves the Tea Party - gets Social Security, Medicare and Unemployment) and would HOWL if their benefits were cut. Most probably don't know what the government's role is supposed to be.

Theresa - posted on 09/17/2010

477

0

This whole Tea Party movement has me confused on so many levels...I run the risk of "babbling" as I write this (so consider yourself warned). Many of these Tea Party "people" are women, admit that they are also conservative, christian, pro-life, anti gay marriage, but they insist that their main focus is less government and less spending. They want to cut government jobs (fire fighters, postal service, police officers, teachers, DMV, etc), social programs (workfare, welfare, Head Start, etc) taxes, and corporate financial restrictions.



What I don't understand however, is that a big portion of these women are receiving government benefits (medicare, medicaid, WIC, social security, disability, veteran's benefits, unemployment benefits, etc.) or at some time in their lives have received them. They have a hard time with the government paying for 911 first responders getting medical care 9 YEARS AFTER the tragedy, the government "forcing" BP to set aside money for the people who were harmed during the oil spill, the government giving states money to repair bridges, roads and highways and the government forcing medical insurance companies to stop"unfair" business practices.



BUT they don't have any problem with the billions of dollars the government spends every month in Afghanistan (or Iraq for that matter) or the billions of dollars the government spends feeding, housing and giving medical care to the "enemy combatants" at GITMO or the super prisons, or the millions of dollars the government already spends on guards and patrols to combat illegal immigration in the border states (in fact they want the federal government to spend more and do more).



Again, I reiterate...I am confused. either you want less spending or you don't. Either you want government involved or you don't. You can't have it both ways.



I used to expect this irrational and disconnected talk from men only...it is disheartening to hear it now from so many women.

Kate CP - posted on 09/16/2010

8,942

36

I wonder what Tea Partiers think of the civil war and how well that went for the confederacy the last time around...