President Blames GOP for Making Life Harder on Unemployed

Gianina - posted on 06/20/2010 ( 13 moms have responded )

311

1

HEY, wait a minute.... last I looked the GOP was the minority in HOUSE and SENATE since (I believe) 2006. The Democrats have control of the whitehouse and congress. They don't need Republicans to pass anything. And yet, they are still blamed?? Are you kidding me. Grow up Mr. O, the blame game is getting old.

==============

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/06/...

President Blames GOP for Making Life Harder on Unemployed

Published June 19, 2010
| Associated Press

Print Email Share Comments (406) Text Size

AP

June 16: President Obama makes a statement in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington after meeting with BP executives.

WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama on Saturday pinned blame on Republicans for making life harder for the unemployed and for those who could lose their jobs without new federal intervention. He did so even as he sought to distance himself from the "dreary and familiar politics" of Washington.

Capping a week in which the administration scored a victory -- a $20 billion fund to be paid by BP for the victims of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill -- Obama reserved his radio and Internet address to focus on the work that didn't get done.

His main concern was the rejection of a bill in the Senate that would have provided more money for the long-term unemployed, aid for strapped state governments and the renewal of popular tax breaks for businesses and individuals.

"If this obstruction continues, unemployed Americans will see their benefits stop," Obama said. "Teachers and firefighters will lose their jobs. Families will pay more for their first home. All we ask for is a simple up or down vote. That's what the American people deserve."

The broad economic bill failed Thursday when Democrats could not muster the 60 votes needed to end debate. The 56-40 vote fell four shy of the total required to break the GOP filibuster. Republicans support many of the policies in the legislation but are demanding changes to shrink its toll on the deficit.

"Americans want us to show we're serious about lowering the debt, so the president and his allies in Congress have a choice to make: they can either vote to reduce the deficit, or they can lock arms and dig an even deeper hole of debt," said Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.

The standoff again revealed the gaps between the Democratic president and the Republican congressional leaders on how to solve the nation's problems.

Obama was at the same time branding the opposition party as obstructionist while seeking a higher level of debate from his own party and Republicans.

"We have an obligation to care for the next generation," Obama said. "So I hope that when Congress returns next week, they do so with a greater spirit of compromise and cooperation. America will be watching."

In his address, Obama also bemoaned the stalling of a separate measure that would lift a $75 million liability cap on economic damages for companies such as BP during disasters like the Gulf oil spill. The Senate is considering a bill to increase that cap to $10 billion.

And Obama also said Republicans are the ones at fault for preventing votes on his nominees to key positions in the government. Former President George W. Bush often had the same complaint about Democratic lawmakers.

Republicans used their weekly address to claim that the president has been too slow to react to the threats posed by the Gulf oil spill and that some steps taken by his administration will do more harm than good.

"I'm glad President Obama is finally putting this catastrophe at the top of his agenda, but his response has been too slow," Sen. Roger Wicker of Mississippi said. Wicker criticized Obama for pushing for an energy bill and increases in oil cleanup fees and for calling for a moratorium on deep-water drilling, which he said would cost jobs and raise the price of energy.

Wicker said Obama should have made the point in his Tuesday speech that many Gulf coast beaches are clean and would welcome tourists. But he acknowledged that Obama made this point at a Monday news conference along the Gulf.

Join Circle of Moms

Sign up for Circle of Moms and be a part of this community! Membership is just one click away.

Join Circle of Moms

13 Comments

View replies by

Pamela - posted on 06/21/2010

1,496

104

Fox News never attacked the Bush administration. They had a love affair with that administration. Bush and company walked on water in the eyes of Murdoch's "news" organization.

The only people who should be ashamed of themselves are the CEO's of British Petroleum. What the WH did was completely appropriate.

Pamela - posted on 06/21/2010

1,496

104

Really. Lol.

Melissa - posted on 06/21/2010

69

15

First, once the GOP stops acting like idiotic children, I will take their complaints seriously. Second, when a group admits to wanting to stop any bill from passing, you can't truly be puzzled why President Obama is upset when they keep a bill from passing. Third...really?

Kelly - posted on 06/20/2010

700

16

First of all, it's really easy to bring up a touchy subject like unemployment and say that the Republicans are the evil party of no. The fact remains, Americans have made it resoundingly clear (at least a majority of Americans) that we are sick and tired of spending money we don't have. "Broad economic bill" is what jumped out at me. Once again, this is another pork laden bill full of useless spending I am sure.......... It is pretty much a given that whenever something of importance is voted on, there is a ton of extra crap stuck to it. That "extra crap" sure adds up quick, and I am glad that the Republicans are at last trying to listen to the voice of the people. Hopefully when they are the majority again, they will continue to listen.

As far as unemployment, isn't it already there for 18 months or something crazy like that? I mean really, it's not meant to live on for ever. People really need to wake up and realize that in a tough economy, sometimes you have to sacrifice. Maybe it's taking a job you don't want. Maybe it's moving to an area with available jobs. How long can people really sit on their butts and whine about not having a job land in their lap? You (generally) can't depend on your job to be there tomorrow as so many have found out. Why then would you put all of your stock in betting that Congress will just keep extending unemployment benefits?

ME - posted on 06/20/2010

2,978

18

sorry...didn't see that Sara already mentioned that...

Krista - posted on 06/20/2010

12,562

16

The only thing about stopping the "blame game" however, is that it is often used as a way to avoid culpability. You see this happening in politics a LOT -- some scandal takes place, there's a brief media firestorm, talk takes place about there possibly being an investigation, then we have all of the politicians on the talking head shows saying that we shouldn't play the "blame game" and that everybody needs to "move forward", and nobody ever winds up being held responsible for anything.

Gianina - posted on 06/20/2010

311

1

Laughing Out Loud, during the time the Dems were the minority, the media, especially the L side media wouldn't report such news. I have seen News on it. LOL. Fox News were attacking Bush back then, but they also described how bad both the Dems/Republican were as well.

As for Barton, he apologized because he was a shamed how the white house conducted themselve with BP....'demanding 20 Billion'..blah blah.

For many years, I felt that the Republican in the Government has forgotten what 'conservative' stands for. I didn't like what they did back then. But I remained with my values

But still, the 'blame game' just got to stop. Blame game does not help stop the spill nor create jobs.

Pamela - posted on 06/20/2010

1,496

104

It's not that the Dems haven't done anything - they have - in spite of tremendous opposition from the Republicans over everything. I don't recall the Dems being quite as oppositional during their minority years. They frequently crossed the isle and signed onto bills that many of us were perhaps not so comfortable with. But that's politics - politics means horse-trading and compromises to attempt to get things done.

I used to be a Republican and right now you couldn't pay me to vote in their direction simply because I view them as totally representative of their own interests and the interests of corporations, not the American people. Holy buckets, they're defending BP? Really? Barton apologizes for the WH "shakedown"? Really? Of course now the Republican party is backtracking on his statement - though apparently he was only saying what was the GOP's stand the day before - and asking that he step down from his position in the party. Nevermind that the Republicans were demanding that the WH do something (like get BP to cover costs to the business owners in the area) and as soon as the WH does just that - it's a "shakedown"!) Ah politics!

BP should pay out the wazzoo for their mismanagement of that oil well (costs were cut - meaning important safety features were not put in place to ensure the well was solid) and they should clean up the unbelievable mess that they created! They should be the ones apologizing. These guys have absolutely nothing to say - as was evidenced before the Senate. Mr Haywood knew nothing of course of the details of well construction, costs or amazingly anything - even though he supposedly is in charge of the whole enterprise. Of course, everyone knows he knows all those compelling answers and that he was undoubtedly instructed not to give over any info until the new guy was put in place.

Regarding Republican obstructionism, check out this article:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/17/us/pol...

Gianina - posted on 06/20/2010

311

1

Not until the other side do the same.

Sara - posted on 06/20/2010

9,313

50

Hey, I never said the Dems hadn't done anything...but if you want to complain about the President stopping his "blame game", maybe you need to stop participating in it as well.

Gianina - posted on 06/20/2010

311

1

Please, when Bush was president, the Dems did exactly what you claim what GOP is doing. Both parties are terrible.

Just with the Gulf situation, Obama wants to stop other drills for oil, which then stops 'jobs'. This is just one example, there are other factors where he distroyed 'small business'. Soooo please, Mr. O, be a man and accept the blame. Put your chin down a notch.

Sara - posted on 06/20/2010

9,313

50

Well, after the health care bill was passed, the GOP publically vowed to fight the President and the Dems on every issue they bring up for debate in Congress, just for the hell of it. I can understand wanting to be fiscally responsible, but to me it doesn't look like the GOP are innocent in all of this. They blocked a bill that would extend benefits for unemployed Americans, so yeah, in fact they are hurting unemployed Americans. Perhaps their reasons are noble, but when you've publically said you will oppose anything proposed by the President, then that doesn't leave me the impression that you're doing things for your constituents or in the name of fiscal responsibility.