feminism equals destruction of family...your thoughts

Wendy - posted on 09/23/2009 ( 26 moms have responded )

23

1

Why I loathe feminism... and believe it will ultimately destroy the family

By Erin Pizzey

Last updated at 9:50 AM on 23rd September 2009

Comments (129) Add to My Stories ERIN PIZZEY set up the world's first refuge for battered women in 1971 - and went on to establish an international movement for victims of domestic violence. But what she has never made public before is that her own childhood was scarred by the shocking cruelty of both her parents.

Here, for the first time, she tells the full harrowing story - and how it led her to a surprising, but deeply felt, conclusion ... Tortured childhood: Erin Pizzey was abused by both her mother and father

Though I remember little of my earliest years, I grew up in a world of extraordinary violence. I was born in 1939 in Tsingtao, China, and shortly after my family moved to Shanghai with my diplomat father, we were captured by the invading Japanese army. It was 1942, the war was raging and we were held under house arrest until we were exchanged for Japanese prisoners of war and put on the last boat out of China.



My father was ordered to Beirut by the diplomatic service, and we were left as refugees in Kokstad, South Africa. From living in an enormous house with a fleet of servants and a nanny, my twin sister Rosaleen and I were suddenly at the mercy of my mother Pat's temper. And it was ferocious. Having escaped the brutality of the war, we were introduced to a new brand domestic cruelty.



Indeed, my mother's explosive temper and abusive behaviour shaped the person I later became like no other event in my life.

Thirty years later, when feminism exploded onto the scene, I was often mistaken for a supporter of the movement. But I have never been a feminist, because, having experienced my mother's violence, I always knew that women can be as vicious and irresponsible as men.

Emotionally abused: Baby Erin (left) and twin sister Rosaleen with their parents

Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the movement, which proclaimed that all men are potential rapists and batterers, was based on a lie that, if allowed to flourish, would result in the complete destruction of family life.

From the very beginning, I waged war against my mother and quickly learned to disassociate myself from the pain of her beatings.

Her words, however, stayed with me all my life. 'You are lazy, useless, and ugly,' she would scream. 'You look like your father's side of the family - Irish trash.'

They were vicious words that I have heard repeated over and over by mothers everywhere. Indeed, when I later opened my refuge for battered women, 62 of the first 100 to come through the door were as abusive as the men they had left.

She was, however, right: I did look like my father, Cyril. While my twin sister was slim and had long dark hair, and my mother's deep blue eyes, I was fat and fair-haired, clumsy, noisy and brash.

I was only five but I knew my mother didn't like meI was only five years old, but I knew my mother didn't like me. And with no servants to restrain her now, she lashed out whenever she felt like it.

When we finally joined my father in a flat in Beirut, I soon realised that he was no saint either. He would constantly scream and rage at all of us.

He was particularly consumed by jealousy. Even though he verbally abused my mother and rarely showed her affection, he seemed compelled to follow her around like a guard dog.

If she spoke on the telephone, he grilled her until she burst into tears. If she went out shopping, he paced the room until she got back and exploded with rage if she were more than a few minutes late.

I hated my father with all my childish heart - and was truly terrified by him. He was 6ft 4in tall, massively built and had a huge paunch that hung over his belt. He stared out of piggy, pale blue eyes and had a big sloppy mouth that slobbered over my lips when he kissed me.

He didn't believe in baths, which he said were 'weakening', and smoked tins of Players Cigarettes, which made him smell like an ashtray. His rages were explosive and unpredictable.

Fresh-faced: Erin Pizzey, founder of the domestic violence charity Refuge, pictured here when she aged just 11

But despite his clumsy, predictable form of macho brutality - born out of his being the 17th child of a violent Irish father - it was my mother's more emotional, verbal form of abuse that scarred me most deeply.

She indulged in a particular kind of soul murder - and it was her cruelty that, even 60 years on, still reduces me to tears and leaves me convinced that feminism is a cynical, misguided ploy.

Unfortunately, at that time, what I wanted more than anything was for my mother to love me - something I never felt she truly did. And so, when my father was posted to Chicago, and I followed my mother to Toronto, to live with my godparents, I was initially hopeful. I believed that without my father's presence, she would have the time be a real mother.

But once in the bosom of this normal family, my own dysfunctional behaviour soon became apparent. I had, it seems, already been too badly damaged by my mother's hatred of me.

I was always in trouble at school, encouraging the other children to behave as badly as I did. On one occasion, I was caught sitting on the doorstep giving away the money I'd stolen from my mother's bag.

Needless to say, my mother went berserk. She took me upstairs and beat me with an ironing cord until the blood ran down my legs. I showed my injuries to my teacher the next morning - but she just stared back impassively and did nothing.

Many years later, when feminists started demonising all fathers, these stark images continually reminded me of the truth - that domestic violence is not a gender issue.

She beat me until the blood ran down my legsShortly after the war, my father was posted to Tehran and we all went to live with him. It was only when I saw him again that I remembered how much I hated him.

He would come home from the office, and as he put the key in the door I would freeze. I would often hear him coughing outside the door - he was still a heavy smoker - and spitting phlegm into the flower bed.

His eyes were windows into his violent moods. If they were narrowed and red, I knew he was in a rage and it would only be a matter of time before he erupted.

But my hatred of my father was pure and uncontaminated by any other emotions. My feelings about my mother, however, were far more complicated.

As much as I was devastated by her hatred of me, I still genuinely strove for her love. In fact, I had moments of great compassion for her when I saw her weeping and wailing in front of my father.

Occasionally, she fought back against his brutality. She was only 4ft 9in, but my mother was extremely strong and her tongue was lethal. She accused him of being an oaf and an idiot. She called his mother a prostitute and his father a common Irish drunk.

Growing old gracefully: Erin Pizzey as she looks these days

Unsurprisingly, my brother and sister were both withdrawn and silent children. My sister suffered from headaches, weeping eczema and mysterious days of paralysis when she was unable to get up from her bed.

To outsiders, my father was a genial, intelligent man and my mother a famous party hostess with three beautiful children and a perfect diplomatic family. In fact, my parents were both violent, cruel people and we were all deeply damaged.

In 1949, my father was posted back to Tien Sien, in China. I was left with my twin sister in a boarding school - Leweston, near Sherborne in Dorset - and my brother accompanied my parents.

Very shortly after they took up their post, however, my parents were captured again - this time by the communists - and held under house arrest for three years.

Without them, I felt an abiding sense of peace and loved my holidays at St Mary's in Uplyme, a holiday home for children whose parents were abroad. Miss Williams, who ran the place, was the first adult that I really admired and respected. She became my mentor.

But this idyll was shattered when I heard that my parents had been released. I remember being called to the telephone in the convent to speak to my mother. I had completely blotted my parents out of my life and so when I heard her Canadian accent, I just screamed down the phone.

'You're not my mother!' I yelled, all too aware that the whole circus was about to start again.

When my mother first returned, to a house outside Axminster, we enjoyed an uneasy truce. I was much taller than her now, and too big for her to batter.

Instead, she began to list my father's faults, and the atrocities he had inflicted on us all, as if I were now her confidante. She would tell me how much she hated him and that they never should have married.

'But I stayed for you,' she told me. 'I stayed because I wanted you to go to a private school and enjoy a comfortable way of life.'

I took the decision that I would have to stab my fatherOnce again, she was unleashing her peculiar brand of emotional cruelty, and placing all the responsibility - and guilt - on me. It was a pattern of behaviour I would witness again and again among some of the women in my refuge.

The day my father was due to join us in the new house, my mother was a nervous wreck. She was crying and clinging on to me, demanding that I protect her. 'I don't want him anywhere near me,' she said.

In dysfunctional families, children, no matter how badly they are treated, will try to take on the parenting role. For me, this still meant protecting and comforting my mother.

And so, on the night of my father's return, I took a large carving knife from the kitchen and went up to my parents' bedroom, which I peered into through a gap in the door. They slept in separate, single beds and I took the extraordinary decision that I would stab him if he tried to force himself on her.





More...What REALLY makes a woman want to sleep with a man?

'My husband can't believe the difference in me': Three women who spent £5,000 to have their muffin tops 'melted away' give their verdicts

How safe is your daughter? How married, middle-class paedophiles use the web to trap girls



I was, on reflection, following my mother's unspoken orders. Remarkably, she had manipulated me to such a degree that I was now willing to murder for her.

My father certainly tried to talk his way into her bed. Fortunately, however, he didn't become physical. If he had, he would now be dead and my life would have turned out very differently.

In the 1950s, while I was working in Hong Kong, my mother was diagnosed with terminal cancer. I returned to our house near Axminster - and found my father unchanged.

By now, he was trying to force my mother to sign her money - she had received a sizeable inheritance from her father - over to him. Week after week, in the local cottage hospital, she refused, and week after week, he ranted and raved at her while she writhed in pain. I begged the nurses to stop him, but they said no one could come between a man and his wife.

At first, my mother refused to believe she was dying. But when my father finally broke her down, and bullied her into signing the papers, her life began to ebb away in earnest.

She died on September 16, 1958, and my father had the body brought home and placed in the dining room. That night, as she lay next door, we sat down to have supper at the table in the hall.

He made us stand vigil over her visibly decomposing bodyAfter supper, my father ordered us into the dining room, where my mother's open coffin was draped with a red cloth. My brother, sister and I begged my father not to remove the cloth, but when we closed our eyes for a moment to say a prayer for her, we opened them to be confronted by her pale face. I vividly remember that there was cotton wool sticking out of her nose.

Every night, we would stand vigil over my mother's body, and every night she would be exposed to the humiliation of having her children see her visibly decomposing. At last, six days later, my father buried her.

I left home the next day and only saw him once more - when I took his ashes to my mother's grave in 1982.

I only decided to talk about my traumatic childhood last week - on a BBC radio programme called The House Where I Grew Up - but I decided long ago I would not repeat the toxic lessons I learned as a child. Instead, I would become a survivor.

Feminism, I realised, was a lie. Women and men are both capable of extraordinary cruelty. Indeed, the only thing a child really needs - two biological parents under one roof - was being undermined by the very ideology which claimed to speak up for women's rights.

This country is now on the brink of serious moral collapse. We must stop demonising men and start healing the rift that feminism has created between men and women.

Harriet Harman's insidious and manipulative philosophy that women are always victims and men always oppressors can only continue this unspeakable cycle of violence. And it's our children who will suffer.





Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/articl...

Join Circle of Moms

Sign up for Circle of Moms and be a part of this community! Membership is just one click away.

Join Circle of Moms

26 Comments

View replies by

Teresa - posted on 07/17/2011

522

34

I never saw feminism and man hating but woman promoting. And that is how I have internalized it. We are equal in value but different in what we offer to society.

Rebecca - posted on 07/17/2011

13

31

Ha ha - Thank you Tammy for supporting my point that you don't really understand feminism so beautifully! I find this hilarious given that I am a mother (of 2 sons), with a male partner (all of whom I love dearly) and a feminist as well. I also have 2 brothers and a father that are pretty cool too :)
Not sure where the man-hating comes in there but anyhoo. Most of the feminists I know genuinely like themselves, their children (those that have them) and the men in their lives.
There is in fact some research that suggests that feminist women have better quality relationships with men, as they tend to believe that the gender stereotypes limit men as much as women.
Also, feminism itself is a fairly dynamic idealogy with many different viewpoints - there are radical feminists, liberal feminists, christian feminists, pro-life feminists, lesbian feminists, hetero feminists, single, married and de-facto feminists, white feminists, black feminists, yound and old feminists - the list goes on really. One of the main goals of feminism is to offer women a choice in how they live their lives - this includes the right to work, or stay at home to parent or even a combination of the 2.
Feminists don't hate men (or children - WTF?!), but they do hate the unequal distribution of power that exists in a patriarchal society and seek to redress that.

Tammy - posted on 07/16/2011

602

25

The original feminists would not recognize todays feminists. In fact they would wholeheartedly disagree with them. If you really take a good look at the modern feminist movement today you will see a picture of self loathing women who can't stand that they we're born women! It's a movement that tries to turn women into men and men into women. Ironically it hates itself. The modern feminist movement apparently doesn't realize that it loudly proclaims that it thinks women are inferior to men while the stay at home mom generally knows otherwise. True equality is realizing and agreeing that while there are different strengths and abilities, those strengths and abilities are of equal "value". On a whole, women are physically weaker than men. While there are exceptions within the whole the majority fit that premise. So no, I do not think that women should automatically get to go into combat situations unless they can do what is expected of the men in the same situation and I don't think it should be adjusted for them. I also think it's best for men to stay out of the daycare field. A 4'8" woman will NOT be able to carry out her 6'4" buddy if he's injured. It's commen sense. Equal rights and equal value but even steven at every point and turn isn't going to happen. Some people are better at some things then others. Men are better at some things then women and women are better at some things then men. Get over it. ;) I think the modern movement needs to be scrapped. They hijacked the original sufferage movement to begin with, they couldn't even come up with something on their own. Additionally, they have a tendency to dislike children. Children remind them too much of being women, which they hate. Most modern feminists want to use their sex to control men, which they also hate. They believe it gives them the ability to be in control in general. But they don't want any consequences, like children. That's why they fight so hard for abortion on demand. Margaret Sanger was a modern day feminist before her time. She ditched her husband and children. She felt they dragged her down. She pretty much admitted that she didn't care much for them and wanted to be able to have sex with whoever she wanted to. (She was also rather racists and wanted to eliminate what she referred to as the "Negro problem" through sterilization. To also include other undesireables like the poor and disabled. Great role model right?) Anyway, today's feminist is not even in the same league as the originals, they can only wish they were. The originals were por-life, pro-motherhood, pro-stay at home (does not exclude running a business since it lends itself to involving the kids), pro-father,pro-husband (an pro-husband BEFORE the kids! *gasp*) I could go on but I need to go to bed;)

Jennifer - posted on 07/16/2011

317

11

I think this is more about domestic violence than feminism but I do see a corollary between the message of feminism and the uselessness of men.

Rebecca - posted on 07/16/2011

13

31

OMG really?! I am not sure most of you even understand what feminism is, given that the consensus seems to be that it means hating men or thinking that women are better than men (which is sort of hypocritical given that most of you go on to say that women are better than men at parenting). It might be worth considering that women are trained and encouraged to be nurturers to some degree ("the emotional, sexual and psychological stereotyping of females begins when the doctor says 'It's a girl.'" Shirley Chisholm). Mind you, we all grow up in the same society, so boys are equally stereotyped and limited by gender norms. More broadly though, to suggest that feminism is focused solely on gender norming and has run out of a reason to exist implies a lack of appreciation for the ways in which women and children are still oppressed, both in the Western world and in developing nations. While there are still issues like female genital mutilation, honour killings, domestic violence and sexual assault (and yes, just because some women are violent does not negate the fact that most (please note that I said most not all) women are the victims and most perpetrators are male (again, please note most not all, and as well, that most men don't perpetrate DV), gendered pay gaps, lack of reproductive choice, poor access to health care for most of the world's women (and the list could go on), then there still exists a need for feminism - the active kind.

Gina - posted on 10/04/2009

1,710

29

Yea, I think girls should not be wrestling with boys. We told my son that if he ever has to wrestle a girl, he has to forfeit the match. It is just wrong for them to be wrestling together. Unfortunately last year he got matched up with a girl, so we left the match early.

Traci - posted on 10/04/2009

2,158

2

I agree as well. Women are not superior to men and men are not superior to women. We have strengths, as do they. Its more like equal, but different, I'd say. Of course there are exceptions to every rule, but in general, men have certain qualities and traits, and women have others. What bugs me about feminism as the way I see it is that boys and girls are exactly the same and they try to blur the gender lines.

For instance, letting girls participate in male high school wrestling. That is BS! If the boy loses, he lost to a girl...if he wins, well, he beat a girl-so what? Nevermind the fact that he's gotta watch where he's grabbing and stuff. That is unfair to males in that situation...same thing with football, or any other contact sport. But try telling that to the girl who wants to join the boys wrestling team or something....the school bows so that they don't end up being sued by the ACLU. Very wrong, IMO.

There is a very real difference between men and women and I think we should embrace our differences rather than deny them. Being a woman and a mother is not something that should make us feel inferior or shameful. We should be proud of what we can do, but also have respect for the things that we cannot do as well. I don't see what is so controversial about that....

Brenda - posted on 10/04/2009

1,958

96

I agree 100% Gina.

Gina - posted on 10/03/2009

1,710

29

I just think when you become a radical in your thinking in any direction is where you go wrong. Yes, women do need the right to vote, but no women are not superior to men. You need to find a right balance.

Brenda - posted on 10/03/2009

1,958

96

Ok ladies, here is a link you must read. As much as I hate the extreme liberal feminists giving women a bad name, we have to be careful. There are those on the extreme right who think that our rights as women should be taken away.

http://thinkprogress.org/2009/09/30/derb...

Christa - posted on 09/30/2009

3,876

14

I think the origins of feminism were good, to get us equal rights etc. But we are there. I feel the feminist movement now is moving towards superiority. They don't want to be treated equally they want to be superior to men. I worry that you will no longer have a choice to balance family with work. It will be a world where if you want to have a career you can't have children or you have to have a nanny raise your children, which is pretty much the same as not having children. You get these career motivated women who can't understand why a women would want 12 weeks off after having a baby. I actually had a boss who told me she came back early because she "got bored". What?!?! How on earth can you be bored with a newborn?



Anyway I think that all they have done in the career world is make us have to compete with women who think they are men. It is NO different for those of us who put family first, but need a second income. Nobody takes a pregnant women serious in the workforce because nobody thinks she'll be back after she has the baby. My last two jobs I have worked for women in an almost 100% women environment and was/am still treated that way. I'm currently in Feb and even though I have assured my boss time and time again that I will be back she constantly makes comments to coworkers about how I won't. And it's not just me she makes these comments about all the women who are pregnant. And she's a mother of 2! Feminism is a joke. They don't want women to be equal, they don't want mothers to be given a fair chance to be successful, they want to take over and make everyone play by their rules. They don't just hate men they hate anyone who still values family.

Danielle - posted on 09/30/2009

28

11

Ah! Here's the website I was just quoting, which is funny since it's CNN. I just can't remember which site I originally read that from. :P



http://archives.cnn.com/2002/HEALTH/cond...

Danielle - posted on 09/30/2009

28

11

Actually, I can't remember where I read it from, but men aren't biologically able to take care of children as a SAHD. Something about the type of stress experienced by those fathers that are causes them to have an increased risk for heart attacks and strokes, high blood pressure, and the like. I wish I could remember the website because it also states that women, unlike men aren't built to handle the stresses of working some of the same jobs that men do. I just find it interesting that science can back up what we feel is right for ourselves and our children.

Gina - posted on 09/29/2009

1,710

29

That's so true, whenever my husband watches my kids I tend to worry, because he's not the most nurturing. Plus they don't really know how to watch them that well. I guess that's just my husband for ya though.

Majors - posted on 09/29/2009

4

13

My Husband would love to be a stay at home dad but our Son drives him nuts. He couldn't do it a week! They are not designed for taking care of children nor have they ever been!

Gina - posted on 09/28/2009

1,710

29

I agree!

Brenda - posted on 09/28/2009

1,958

96

I completely agree, Lindsay. The majority of them are control freaks too, and that is one of my biggest pet peeves.

Lindsay - posted on 09/28/2009

379

41

Im all for equal rights, i will tell my daughter she can do anything she wants to do. It's the extreme man hating feminism that ruins families. I would like to see a woman that can get pregnant without a man or sperm from a man. Fact is men are needed and women that hate them and think they are holding women down are just stupid in my opinion. You are only held down if you allow it.

Feminism nowdays is a joke. They want more rights not equal rights but they are perfectly fine with women being hired for jobs they can't do. Look at the military, they don't get the same training as the men do and you don't see the feminists fighting that. Where is their outrage over women not having to register for the draft? They want to pick and choose what they are offended over and its annoying

Majors - posted on 09/24/2009

4

13

I agree 100%! Woman who fought for equality, fought against their children.

Danielle - posted on 09/24/2009

28

11

I'm with you on this. I love providing for my children and my fiancee, and can't imagine being anything different. I love housework and being the one that cooks and takes care of the house. I am what I have coined (thanks to listening to Rush Limbaugh) the anti-feminazi, and I can't imagine myself being anything else.

Brenda - posted on 09/24/2009

1,958

96

Amen, ladies!

Gina - posted on 09/23/2009

1,710

29

I couldn't have said it better than all of you have said it. I do feel that there is a difference between men and women, and that we need to recognize those differences. I am greatful for some of the womens rights in being able to vote and stuff. I feel that something is going on right now to confuse people to think that it's ok that we are all the same, because it's not. I think we were born the gender we are for a reason, and that is something that shouldn't be changed.

I do think it does come down to the family, and the destruction of it.

Lisa - posted on 09/23/2009

73

34

Feminism..well, in the old days was to give women the opportunities denied to citizens...which until the right to vote was given to women...they were NOT. If woman lost her husband, she lost everything. Feminism today is really trying to change the role of gender to gender neutral.

I don't believe we were created to be like men. I don't know how to act like a man.I don't believe men know that about women. I believe that feminism like many of you, wants to crush motherhood, womanhood. I believe that pushing our girls to become educated to the point that they don't marry, don't have children, and have no use for men..other than to donate parts to create a child that they may want later is bad. I have worked to teach my sons to respect the roles of womanhood...mother, wife, nurturer, teacher...as one of you said...when a baby girl reaches for a baby doll to cuddle it..to love it, it is really inate in that girl to do that. Does that mean that boys cannot be nurturing? No, it just doesn't come as naturally to them...they have their own roles....father, husband, provider, protector...hum...isn't that why at 2 years old, their index finger and thumb are a gun? I think that as women who live in our society today, we must safeguard these fundamental roles. All females are being told that we are not tolerant of those who don't except these roles for themselves and that we have no right to teach our daughters those roles. I deeply respect the power of creation within my body and I teach my daughter to do the same. I do this to help her to be able to be in a position to make choices with regard to that as she gets older..to preserve it and protect it. To me, it is a sacred work to bring children into this world. Feminism would tell me that that is THE the minimal part of what I do. I often share with others that feminism needs to be replaced with words like womanhood. I am proud to be a woman. I love it. I don't want to be anything else. I am happy to be married to a man. I am educated and I have a desire to learn and develop who I am...but I also have made a choice to bring children into the world. They need all of my attention...so, I don't choose to have a career...I choose to be home raising children. I love that part of my womanhood. It is important that we teach girls not be ashamed of being a mother and a wife. I am not a slave to my husband...I am his co-partner. We couldn't raise our children with the balance without both parts- male and female. I do believe women should learn all that they can....but it is time for us to be ok with the roles that we have. Beth, I loved your quote from Dr. Dobson....It is a destructionto the family to be a feminist...I would much rather see us all embrace the role of womanhood...it is not something that I ever apologize for nor do I feel less because I am not out saving corporations. I feel that my role is to help bring good solid young men and women into our society who will work at preserving the family. Thank you for bringing this idea to be discussed. POWER TO THE MOMMA - THE HAND THAT ROCKS THE CRADLE...CAN LITERALLY CHANGE THE WORLD!!!!

Beth - posted on 09/23/2009

22

13

let me clarify...there are two separate ways of looking at feminism. How it has started and what it has become. Feminism started as early as the 1800's. Originally it focused on the promotion of equal contract and property rights for women and the opposition to chattel marriage and ownership of married women (and their children) by their husbands. However, by the end of the nineteenth century, activism focused primarily on gaining political power, particularly the right of women's suffrage.

Now what is feminism today? what has it become? In the 1970's, feminists began insisting that sexes were identical except for their reproductive apparatus, and that any uniqueness in temperament or behavior resulted from patriarchal cultural bias. - they insisted boys and girls should be raised exactly the same - etc.

So I believe that the feminist movement originally derived from something that would be beneficial for the women of America, but has become something that I despise. It is ridiculous to even consider their stupidity to be anything but the rantings of crazy women.

Traci - posted on 09/23/2009

2,158

2

Feminism is okay in the sense that its given women the power to vote and hold office and stuff, which is great (I don't think you all want to be sporting burquas or anything, right?) but the rabid feminism that dispises boys being boys and girls being girls is what I think is bad for the family. Women are nurturing biologically, it only makes sense for women to take care of the babies. Its not that men can't do it, or that women can't work, but I think in general, it's best for the mom to be the one to do the child rearing because we are nurturers at heart. When I look at my daughters taking care of their baby dolls at age one, you cannot tell me that is something learned. My girls are girly and my boy is a BOY. This whole chick-i-fication of boys sounds all noble to liberals right now, but if they had their way, I think they'd come to regret it. There IS a difference between male and female, they just don't want to acknowledge it.



They are doing everything in their power to take away the importance of the family. Such a shame. Family is first and everything else comes later....

Beth - posted on 09/23/2009

22

13

I would like to add to this "feminism equals the destruction of family". I have recently been reading, "Bringing Up Boys" by Dr. James Dobson from "Focus on the Family". I read something that I thought would be quite interesting to share...



First, it is impossible to understand what is happening to our kids today without considering the influence of feminist ideology. Many aspects of our culture have become unisexual. No wonder boys have only a vague idea what it means to be a man. Should men be feminized, emasculated, and “wimpified”? That is precisely what some feminists seem to think. In the 1970s a small but noisy band of feminists began insisting that the sexes were identical except for their reproductive organs, and that any uniqueness in temperament or behavior resulted from patriarchal cultural biases. Most of the early feminists didn't like children, and deeply resented men, yet they advised millions of women about how to raise their children and, especially, how to educate boys. In 1999 two radical feminists contended in an article that fathers are actually detrimental at home because of the amount of family resources they consume.



Second, another source of confusion is the powerful gay and lesbian agenda. In public schools children are taught the need to accommodate homosexuality, and are encouraged to embrace the view that all lifestyles are equal. Gay and lesbians seek to eliminate such terms as wife, husband, manhood, womanhood, boy, girl, masculine and feminine. These references to sexual identity are being replaced with gender-neutral terms, such as significant other, spouse, parent, child, and sibling. Some extremists even see the natural heterosexual family as an enemy. An article in Gay Community News stated, "The family unit – spawning ground of lies, betrayals, mediocrity, hypocrisy and violence – will be abolished. The family unit, which only dampens imagination and curbs free will, must be eliminated."



Third, divorce is detrimental during childhood when boys are especially vulnerable. Dobson notes that the most critical time is at the onset of puberty, when members of both sexes experience an emotional and hormonal upheaval. He observes, "Boys and girls at that time desperately need their father's supervision and love. Divorces at that time, more than at others, are typically devastating to boys." For example, a study revealed that 90 per cent of children from divorced homes suffered from an acute sense of shock when the separation occurred, including profound grieving and irrational fears.