Scientific Evidence That Homosexuality is Treatabl

Brenda - posted on 06/26/2009 ( 6 moms have responded )

1,958

96

I just got this in my email today from Family Watch International.



"I am pleased to announce that the U.S.-based National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH) has just released its long-awaited comprehensive review of over 125 years of scientific research on homosexuality. This groundbreaking report, “What Research Shows,” dispels the myths that are commonly used to promote the legalization of same-sex marriage and the mainstreaming of homosexuality throughout society and in the public schools by force of law.

NARTH is a professional association of scientists and mental health professionals whose stated mission is to conduct and disseminate scientific research on homosexuality, promote effective treatment, and to protect the right of individuals with unwanted same-sex attraction to receive effective care. While one might think that such a mission would be viewed as both commendable and relatively non-controversial, the reality is just the opposite.

Homosexual activists try to suppress research on same-sex attraction because one of the pillars of homosexual advocacy is the falsehood that homosexuals are “born that way” and cannot change their orientation. Since the NARTH report proves that homosexuality can be changed through therapy in the same way conditions like alcoholism and other addictions can be changed, the whole case for mainstreaming homosexuality into society crumbles. Another myth the NARTH report disproves is that therapy to help people with unwanted same-sex attraction is ineffective and even harmful.

The extensive research and clinical experience reviewed by NARTH makes it clear even to a layman that these claims are false.

Homosexual activists spread these misconceptions about homosexuality and even persecute their own who seek treatment because they know that public opinion polls show that people who believe homosexuals are born that way are more likely to support the homosexual agenda. NARTH is one of the very few credible, professional organizations anywhere in the world that is successfully challenging this propaganda.

Specifically, the NARTH report substantiates the following conclusions:

1. There is substantial evidence that sexual orientation may be changed through reorientation therapy.

“Treatment success for clients seeking to change unwanted homosexuality and develop their heterosexual potential has been documented in the professional and research literature since the late 19th century. ...125 years of clinical and scientific reports which document those professionally-assisted and other attempts at volitional change from homosexuality toward heterosexuality has been successful for many and that such change continues to be possible for those who are motivated to try.”

2. Efforts to change sexual orientation have not been shown to be consistently harmful or to regularly lead to greater self-hatred, depression, and other self-destructive behaviors.

“We acknowledge that change in sexual orientation may be difficult to attain. As with other difficult challenges and behavioral patterns—such as low-self-esteem, abuse of alcohol, social phobias, eating disorders, or borderline personality disorder, as well as sexual compulsions and addictions—change through therapy does not come easily.”

“We conclude that the documented benefits of reorientation therapy—and the lack of its documented general harmfulness—support its continued availability to clients who exercise their right of therapeutic autonomy and self-determination through ethically informed consent.”

The NARTH report warns that “The limited body of clinical reports that claim that harm is possible—if not probable— if a person simply attempts to change typically were written by gay activist professionals.”

3. There is significantly greater medical, psychological, and relational pathology in the homosexual population than the general population.

“Researchers have shown that medical, psychological and relationship pathology within the homosexual community is more prevalent than within the general population. …In some cases, homosexual men are at greater risk than homosexual women and heterosexual men, while in other cases homosexual women are more at risk than homosexual men and heterosexual women. …Overall, many of these problematic behaviors and psychological dysfunctions are experienced among homosexuals at about three times the prevalence found in the general population—and sometimes much more. …We believe that no other group of comparable size in society experiences such intense and widespread pathology.”

You can read NARTH’s executive summary of the report on our Web site here.

Good public policy cannot be based on lies, misconceptions and fallacies. That is why it is essential that we do all we can to spread the information in the NARTH report far and wide, but especially that we get it into the hands of legislators and policymakers around the world. Because of a political agenda, thousands of people around the world with unwanted same sex-attraction are being denied the help and the basic facts about their affliction.

In light of the clear health problems the report documents, homosexual activists are putting many lives at even greater risk by suppressing the truth about unwanted same-sex attraction. We hope you will join us in spreading this information far and wide.

Sincerely,



Sharon Slater

President"



www.familywatchinternational.org

Join Circle of Moms

Sign up for Circle of Moms and be a part of this community! Membership is just one click away.

Join Circle of Moms

6 Comments

View replies by

Gina - posted on 07/01/2009

1,710

29

Quoting Tammy:

I'm glad to see this report, though I've never been swayed by the whole "they were born that way" thing anyway. What if they were? That is in no way the end of the argument even if it's true. For one, alcoholism runs in my family. There's a confirmed genetic link. So....what? Should I just lie in the gutter drunk all the time because I was "born that way" and there's no point in fighting it? Also, as a Christian I believe that when it comes to sinful desires, we're all "born that way" which is why we need a Savior.



Great point, I like how you explained that!

Tammy - posted on 07/01/2009

556

9

I'm glad to see this report, though I've never been swayed by the whole "they were born that way" thing anyway. What if they were? That is in no way the end of the argument even if it's true. For one, alcoholism runs in my family. There's a confirmed genetic link. So....what? Should I just lie in the gutter drunk all the time because I was "born that way" and there's no point in fighting it? Also, as a Christian I believe that when it comes to sinful desires, we're all "born that way" which is why we need a Savior.

Traci - posted on 06/27/2009

2,158

2

Well, I don't get liberal arguments. According to them gay people are born that way and you cannot help who you are attracted to, right? Wouldn't that also apply to people who are only attracted to children? So, why are they opposed to locking up child molesters for life? They believe we should "rehabilitate" them. If you can rehabilitate molesters (they are attracted to kids just like gays are attracted to their same sex), why not gays? Their argrument just doesn't make sense. But, that doesn't surprise me, nothing they say is logical.

Brenda - posted on 06/26/2009

1,958

96

Quoting Christa:

Very interesting! I'm going to check out the full report and I'm definitely passing this on.

On Anne Heche, of course they dismiss it. It proves there is a choice associated with the behavior. On another thread I brought that up and I was told that Anne Heche wasn't a good example and then it was implied that she was never actually gay. Convenient. :-)


Yes, very convienient!  But I really don't know how the libs, as the intellectuals they claim to be, can dispute over 100 years worth of  scientific study!

Christa - posted on 06/26/2009

3,876

14

Very interesting! I'm going to check out the full report and I'm definitely passing this on.



On Anne Heche, of course they dismiss it. It proves there is a choice associated with the behavior. On another thread I brought that up and I was told that Anne Heche wasn't a good example and then it was implied that she was never actually gay. Convenient. :-)

Gina - posted on 06/26/2009

1,710

29

Yay, finally a study that confirms what I have always believed. I think also, real life evidence proves that one too. Look at Anne Heche, and many other former homosexuals that turn straight. I'm sure mainstream media and society will quickly disregard this.