Chelsea - posted on 10/27/2009 ( 7 moms have responded )
2
7
Chelsea - posted on 10/27/2009 ( 7 moms have responded )
2
7
Sign up for Circle of Moms and be a part of this community! Membership is just one click away.
Join Circle of Moms
Brandy - posted on 10/27/2009
1,353
0
It hasn't technically been proven but my daughter was always between 155 and 170 and my son always between 130 and 145. My OB says she's always used it as a guess and it has worked for her most of the time.
Erin - posted on 10/27/2009
7
2
Any of the temperature/location of fetus (high or low)/heart rate/Chinese birth calender "birth predictors" are usually false. If they give a correlating response, it's most likely just a coincidence. The only sure-fire 100% was of knowing the baby's sex is peeking between their legs once they're born (and even that's not 100%, as there are a few locations in the world where it's been documented that children are born anatomically female and then develop into men at puberty). Having an amniocentesis is pretty accurate - I don't know the exact rates, but I'd assume it's pretty close to 100%, as it's actual fetal cells. But they are risky and painful and should not be used solely for determining the sex of the baby.
Chelsea - posted on 10/27/2009
2
7
First time we heard the heart beat it was 155 and the second time was 153. But I find out Nov 3rd for sure. Ill be 19 weeks tomorrow
Jenifer - posted on 10/27/2009
1,322
7
Its a myth. Fetal heart rates vary a lot throughout pregnancy, and with movement. There's no correlation with gender.
Daphne - posted on 10/27/2009
149
80
Hi I was told the same thing!! But when I was pregnant with my son his HB was 158-160.....
Sandra - posted on 10/27/2009
4
14
i heard it's a myth, but my son did have a lower heart rate once it regulated (150bpm).
Donna - posted on 10/27/2009
4
13
I know that when I was preg with both my boys.. The HB was 120-140 and when I was preg with my daughter her HB was 147-160..
7 Comments
View replies by