10 Facts That Prove The Bin Laden Fable Is a Contrived Hoax

♏*PHOENIX*♏ - posted on 05/09/2011 ( 88 moms have responded )

4,455

6

402

Paul Joseph Watson

Infowars.com

May 9, 2011



Merely a week after President Obama announced the death of Osama Bin Laden, there is literally a deluge of evidence that clearly indicates the whole episode has been manufactured for political gain and to return Americans to a state of post-9/11 intellectual castration so that they can be easily manipulated in the run up to the 2012 election. Here are ten facts that prove the Bin Laden fable is a contrived hoax….



1) Before last Sunday’s raid, every intelligence analyst, geopolitical commentator or head of state worth their salt was on record as stating that Osama Bin Laden was already dead, and that he probably died many years ago, from veteran CIA officer Robert Baer, to former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, to former FBI head of counterterrorism Dale Watson. In addition, back in 2002 Alex Jones was told directly by two separate high level sources that Bin Laden was already dead and that his death would be announced at the most politically opportune moment. Top US government insider Dr. Steve R. Pieczenik, a man who held numerous different influential positions under five different Presidents, serving as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under the Nixon, Ford and Carter, told the Alex Jones Show last week that Bin Laden died of marfan syndrome shortly after he was visited by CIA physicians at the American Hospital in Dubai in July 2001.



2) The official narrative of how the raid unfolded completely collapsed within days of its announcement. First there had been a 40 minute shootout, then there was no shootout and just one man was armed, first Bin Laden was armed then he was not, first Bin Laden used his wife as a human shield and then he did not. First the compound was described as a “$1 million dollar mansion” then it turned out to be a rubbish-strewn dilapidated compound that was worth less than a quarter of that. Almost every single aspect of the official narrative has changed since Obama first described the raid last Sunday as the White House struggles to keep its story straight.



3) The alleged body of Bin Laden was hastily dumped in the sea to prevent any proper procedure of identification. The White House claimed this was in accordance with normal Islamic burial rituals, however numerous Muslim scholars all over the globe disputed this claim, pointing out that Muslims can only be buried at sea if they die at sea. While the White House claimed that Bin Laden’s death on May 1st was proven by DNA and facial recognition evidence, such proof was never released for public scrutiny and the Obama administration refused to release photos of Bin Laden’s dead body, suggesting a cover-up.



4) Despite the fact that the White House released “situation room” photos which purported to show Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and the rest of Obama’s security staff watching the raid which killed Bin Laden live, it was later admitted by CIA director Leon Panetta that Obama could not have seen the raid because the live feed was cut off before the Navy SEALS entered the compound. The photos were described by many as having “historical significance,” forming a “captivating” record of Obama’s greatest success and being the “defining moment” of his Presidency. One image showed Hillary Clinton with her hand over her mouth as if witnessing an anxious or crucial moment in the raid. Media reports at the time claimed that the photos represented the moment when “The leader of the free world saw the terror chief shot in the left eye.” However, the photos were staged as a PR stunt for public consumption, nobody in the photos ever saw Bin Laden killed live, nor did they see the Navy SEALS even enter the compound.



5) As even mainstream journalists began to cast suspicion on the official narrative behind the raid, the media reported that Al-Qaeda itself had confirmed every detail of Obama’s address the the nation. However, the conduit for such a claim was in fact an organization called SITE, which is a notorious Pentagon propaganda front run by the daughter of an Israeli spy that has been caught on numerous occasions releasing fake cartoonish “Al-Qaeda” videos at the most politically expedient times for both the Bush and Obama administrations. The SITE organization is nothing more than a contractor for the U.S. government, receiving some $500,000 a year annually from Uncle Sam, and yet the corporate media instantly swallowed and regurgitated the claim that “Al-Qaeda” had confirmed the official story after SITE directed them to an anonymous posting on an Islamic website.



6) Almost every single neighbor that lived near the alleged Bin Laden compound in Abbottabad that was interviewed by news reporters said with absolute certainty that they had never seen Bin Laden and that they knew of no evidence whatsoever to suggest he lived there. Since the town is a staging ground for the Pakistani military, which has a training facility situated virtually a stone’s throw away from the alleged Bin Laden compound, residents were required to show ID when they moved into the area. Pakistani troops and anti-terror police in the town refused to confirm that Bin Laden had lived in the house. Barack Obama himself admitted to 60 Minutes that the White House was only 55/45 sure that Osama lived there before the raid and this uncertainty prompted concerns that the US Navy SEALS sent in could have targeted a “prince from Dubai” or some other individual that was not Bin Laden.



7) The videos released by the White House this past weekend which purport to show Osama Bin Laden making Al-Qaeda tapes in October-November 2010 are almost identical to footage first released by Pentagon front group SITE nearly four years ago. Remember, a May 2010 Washington Post story reported how the CIA had admitted to making fake Bin Laden videos. Despite the White House’s insistence that the footage of Bin Laden is recent, he looks younger and healthier than tapes released almost a decade ago, having apparently dyed his beard black. A separate video that purports to show Bin Laden in his compound flicking through satellite TV channels depicts a much older looking man with a gray beard. Analysts have pointed out that the man has different shaped ears to real Osama pictures from back in 2001. A doctor has also pointed out the fact that the man in the tapes released Saturday has no problem moving his left arm, whereas video from 2001 clearly illustrates how Bin Laden was unable to move his left upper extremity because of a permanent injury probably related to damage to the peripheral nerves. Why the cameraman would film the back of Bin Laden’s head as he watches television is also dubious. Residents in the town of Abbottabad claim the man in the “television” video is not Osama, with one individual claiming that the man labeled by the White House as being Bin Laden is actually his neighbor, a man named Akhbar Han.





8: Despite the fact that numerous neo-cons came out on the days after the alleged raid to erroneously assert that torturing terror suspects at Guantanamo Bay led to the discovery of Bin Laden, Osama himself, the supposed world’s most wanted terrorist and a treasure trove of terror information, despite the fact that he was unarmed, was not taken in for questioning, he was instantly shot in the head according to the official narrative.



9) The US government has been caught on several occasions within the past decade staging military operations for the purposes of generating contrived, pro-war sentiment amongst the American public. Both the “rescue” of Jessica Lynch and the death of Pat Tillman were complete fables, scripted and staged at complete odds with the truth and unleashed on Americans as part of a psychological warfare offensive to elicit support for the war on terror, almost identical to what we’re seeing now with the Bin Laden sideshow. Given the fact that the US government has been caught red-handed scripting tales of pure fiction in order to justify the war on terror, notably in the cases of Jessica Lynch and Pat Tillman, why on earth should we believe them now?



10) Despite the fact that Obama announced last Sunday on live television that the world was now “safer” because Bin Laden was dead, his administration, with the aid of the fearmongering mass media, instantly seized upon the situation to terrify Americans into being afraid of imminent “reprisal” terror attacks inside the United States, later claiming that Bin Laden had formulated an “aspirational rather than operational” plan to derail US trains that travel over 500mph, although no trains in the US can actually travel at such speeds. This led “terror experts” to salivate over how TSA agents were now needed in shopping malls to stick their hands down Americans’ pants, while New York Senator Chuckie Schumer called for the no fly list to be expanded to trains and subways. Obama hurried to ground zero for a photo op as he desperately tried to use the Bin Laden hoax to whip up phony patriotism as a means of boosting his flagging poll numbers. Others, like Democrat Bill Richardson, exploited the situation to try and push through policies that had no connection to Bin Laden or terrorism at all, like cap and trade. The haste with which the whole Bin Laden fable was exploited for political points scoring and as a psychological ploy to return Americans to a post-9/11 state of intellectual castration was painfully transparent, clearly suggesting that the entire farce was planned well in advance to achieve precisely those goals in the run up to 2012.

MOST HELPFUL POSTS

Tammy - posted on 05/10/2011

1

0

4

Tara if you want solid proof that bin Laden did die in May where is the solid proof he has been dead for a really really long time? You say the american public needs to stop believe the "news" that is written more as propaganda but the way some people see it your just believing a different story.. a story made by rumors. Who doesnt have solid proof as well.
You know?

Esther - posted on 05/10/2011

3,513

32

144

This just makes me shake my head. Unbelievable. Let's not believe any legitimate source of news, but some guy on a blog. Robert Baer MAY have said years ago that he thought (!) OBL was already dead, but he has been interviewed by several news sources in the last week and other than the part about whether or not the Pakistanis were in on the raid, he's not questioning the story at all right now. The idea that somehow Bush would happily sit back and wait for Obama (of all people) to take the credit for Osama's death is sheer insanity in and off itself. But it would have to go beyond that. Everyone in both administrations would have to be willing to go along with the lie. The military would also have to be willing to go along with the lie. The Wikileaks schandal didn't turn up any hints of Osama's demise years ago. Al Queda would have to have gone along with this all these years (and still go along with it today). Osama Bin Laden's wives must have been instructed to tell their tales to boost Obama's ratings. Nobody in the Middle East or any of their intelligence agencies ever came out and said he was dead or says this is all a hoax now. Al Jazeera was coerced into going along too. And despite being able to pull off this massive coordination of all these people around the world to commit the greatest hoax ever, all of which was designed to make Obama look good (he must be more loved around the world than God), they couldn't get the details straight about the raid from the get-go. Yes, seems likely.

Amber - posted on 05/09/2011

1,909

13

145

I can't fathom that Osama bin Laden death was known as far back as 2002 and President Bush didn't announce it. His popularity ratings were dropping drastically and it would have given him a big boost. Why would he keep his mouth shut and let a future president take the glory? Seems unlikely to me....

Esther - posted on 05/12/2011

3,513

32

144

He even stated on multiple occassions that he would never allow himself to be arrested and that he wanted to go out in a gun fight. I guess he got his wish.

As for the Bush hoax, that hoax wasn't very successfully pulled off. Lots of people & various countries were on record doubting that there were any nuclear weapons in Iraq. The best they could do was say they THOUGHT there were. There was doubt (on a more serious level than this conspiracy theory) all along. I personally never believed it either. And obviously the truth came to light VERY quickly.

Sara - posted on 05/12/2011

9,313

50

586

Tammy, I agree with you. Bin Laden was the public face of a terrorist organization -- by his own choice. He looks awfully proud in all those videos. And Jenny, you shouldn't feel bad for the guy, he's a martyr now, which is what I'm sure he wanted all along.

88 Comments

View replies by

Caitlin - posted on 05/12/2011

1,915

5

172

There is a huge difference between the Nazis and Osama by the way. The National socialist party (the Nazi party) was legitamitaly voted into power in germany and started off with a legit platform and a legit party in the country's parliment. It was not to begin with a terrorist organization. The Nazi party started a WAR, a legitamite war based on land and ressources, and were conquering nations. They went off track and did some heinous shit, and I'm not condoning what they did, but they were legit.

Al Quaida is a very different beast, since it was never a legitamite party, wasn't voted into power, and their attacks have nothing to do with land or ressources, only killing. That makes them terrorists, much unlike the Nazi party.

Keep it in mind that if the Nazis had won, they'd be writing the textbooks, we'd be speaking german and the people that resisted them would be the ones in the wrong. History is written by the winners..

Tammy - posted on 05/12/2011

1

0

4

true that amanda!
I dont wanna see pictures of a dead person either! lol
Even though if they release photos people will probably be like
"Thats totally not the osama bin laden I remember! that looks nothing like him! this picture is proof its a hoax!"

Weemp woommmp

Amanda - posted on 05/12/2011

697

15

25

the way i see it is that the story we know is likely not all totally true, some of it is contrived... not a "hoax" though. the reason i say this is because there are obviously soooo many facts about the raid (as well as leading up to the raid) that are still classified info. so we may never know the whole story, doesn't mean it's a conspiracy. also, why does everyone want to see the photos??? what would that prove? if you saw a picture of dead osama how would you (i use "you" in the broad sense) know it was really him? i sure wouldn't know him from some look-a-like! and i sure as hell don't enjoy photos of dead people. if they released the DNA evidence.... what exactly would that prove unless you personally were there for the collection of the sample, hand walked it to the lab, did the testing yourself and knew how to read the report?

Rosie - posted on 05/12/2011

8,657

30

321

jenny, i was looking into this incident you are talking about and it doesn't seem like its as simple as you're making it sound. there were 2 incidences ine on aug. 2nd 1964 where vietnam boats attacked the uss maddox, and a fire fight ensued, another 2 days later is the one disputed that never happened. so either way the united states WAS attacked at least once.

Tammy - posted on 05/12/2011

1

0

4

I just dont believe that everyone who knew of the operation before it happened just came together and was like "Alright! Soooo lets go against the law and just shoot him. We'll just say he was loaded. No one will suspect a thing!"
Something MUST have happened for them to make this decision.
Plus Mohammed is waiting for trial right now i believe? Theres no date but i think its still in question

Tammy - posted on 05/12/2011

1

0

4

A-ha! But Hitler was the leader of the Nazis just like bin Laden was the leader of the terrorists.
Suspected terrorists are being held on trial

Jenny - posted on 05/12/2011

4,426

16

129

I've seen leaks where he admits to not doing it to. All excellent things to be decided in a court of law. Even the Nazis got a trial and they killed millions.

Tammy - posted on 05/12/2011

1

0

4

When you say "took credit" with quotes and everything does that mean you believe he admitted to it?
I understand that you say "skeptical" video but earlier it took you one video to believe the residents reactions
I do not have links to more videos.. only a recent quote i read from U.S. Atty. Gen. Eric H. Holder Jr
"Let me make something very clear," Holder said. "The operation in which Osama bin Laden was killed was lawful. He was the head of Al Qaeda, an organization that conducted the attacks of September the 11th [2001]. He admitted his involvement."
I took that from LA times. Heres the link http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washingt...

Jenny - posted on 05/12/2011

4,426

16

129

He "took credit" in 1 skeptical video. If I am mistaken, please give me some links. He was never charged with the crime, let alone tried. That is not the system we have fought for in our countries to determine who is guilty and who is not. We don't try people in the media and then shoot them in the face. That does not represent justice.

Tammy - posted on 05/12/2011

1

0

4

I hope we dont ignore that.

but jenny I'm pretty sure the US Government learns from their mistakes and history as well. Thats why a lot of change.
This was something that they carried out themselves. Not anyone else. So I dont think they have a problem convincing themselves thats what they really did. I dont know if you understood that lol I keep trying to word it better.

Dana - posted on 05/12/2011

11,264

35

495

So are we still ignoring the fact that Bin Laden took credit for the attacks?

Jenny - posted on 05/12/2011

4,426

16

129

I never said I felt bad for him. I feel bad that justice failed. I believe history will show I am right on this one.

The US Government was convinced that North Vietnam attacked US destroyers which led to the Vietnam War too. We just only recently found out it didn't happen due to declassifying documents. http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAE... I'm sure everyone was 100% convinced an attack had occurred and were gungho to go to war then too. Just because the government is convinced, doesn't make it true.

Where's Wikileaks when you need them? Never mind.

Tammy - posted on 05/12/2011

1

0

4

LOL Dana im with you on that one.

but for Jenny people get wrongfully accused a lot. And im not saying it doesnt worry me but I kinda feel like osama bin laden put himself as the face of all the terrorists. You know what Im saying? In a way by showing his face in response to the 911 and all the terrorist attacks he's admitting to the fact that if America wanted someone to blame it would be him. and maybe a few other people lol correct me if im wrong though!

Does it make it right to kill him without trial? mm Im not sure. But for me thats the least of my worries and doesnt leave me to believe this was a hoax.

Sara - posted on 05/12/2011

9,313

50

586

"Didn't that shake your world view at all?"

No, because I never believed there were any WMD's either.

Dana - posted on 05/12/2011

11,264

35

495

Good Lord...there's a big difference between the Bush Administration lying about weapons of mass destructions and this.
When you people come up with these ideas do you really think them through?

[deleted account]

Oh - and to you guys that think this is all phoo-ey, do you remember the bit when George Bush admitted that there weren't any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq?

Didn't that shake your world view at all?

JL - posted on 05/11/2011

3,635

48

107

*bangs head into keyboard, looks up at the screen* Nope this is real. *bangs head again and wishes the black hole would suck her up and take her to a new universe*

Constance - posted on 05/11/2011

2,651

24

146

Do we really need a judge and jury when someone very publicly admits to bombing people in several countries and flying planes into sides of building. He was very proud of his so-called work. He convicted himself and very proudly did.
They only question I have is if he died in 2002 as this report says then why are his sons speaking publicly now that he was murdered?

[deleted account]

The moment I saw the news about Bin Laden's death and saw the Pres's speech I was struck by how contrived and phoney the whole thing looked... and sure enough, within hours they backtracked on several of their initial statements. What else will be proved wrong?



If you don't believe everything you're told, it necessarily doesn't make you a conspiracy nutcase, it means you're not gullible.



It might actually show that you've learnt from history.

Amber - posted on 05/11/2011

1,909

13

145

How would being shot from behind change anything? It could have been a sniper, or he could have been surrounded. It doesn't mean there weren't people in front of him....There are just so many variables.

I don't know exactly what happened there, and I don't think I ever will. But to me, the difference is knowing HOW he died, not WHEN he died.
Details are just that, details.

Jenny - posted on 05/11/2011

4,426

16

129

He was (supposedly) executed for a crime he was never charged with or convicted of commiting. That should worry people who believe they live in a free and just country. For those who beleive he did die in the compound, do you think they won't release pics because he was shot from behind?

Caitlin - posted on 05/11/2011

1,915

5

172

And elvis is still alive..

I don't necesarily believe they divulged the whole story, nor shoudl they have to.. Maybe if they did a CSI episode, or maybe something popular, i dunno, Hawaii 5-0 episode about how it happened then people would believe it. You'll never get the full story, you only really know exactly what happened if you were there, and even then the most unreliable witness is an eye witness, so even THAT account will be skewed. Either way, I don't see how this changes anything, it's not like "oh good, the bastard is dead, let's go home and make tea" there's still a war, and al quaida said this will not stop them from attcking again, so what's the big deal about it really? Another crackpot will rise to "power" and so more heinous shit..

Jenny - posted on 05/11/2011

4,426

16

129

Not believing the story the government puts out does not equate to what any one person does believe or does not. The birth certificate facade was good old fashioned racism.



For me, I'm not sure what that is that occured but I don't believe the story they are selling. I know Bin Ladin has been trained by the CIA, I know the Al Queda group that confirmed his death has been on the US payroll for years. I know that it doesn't matter which party was in power as they are two sides of the same coin running things for corporate interests. Republicans and Democrats are not enemies of each other but it sure makes for great TV commentary.



False Flag Operations have been in use by various governments and other entiites for centuries, only technology has allowed us to move beyond literally waving the enemy's flag as a trick. Here are some that indeed have occured: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag



The Gulf of Tonkin incident that started the US into the Vietnam War has been found to be a false flag operation as well. History is littered with them and in time maybe we will have a better perspective on what really is happening over there right now. It's not a bad thing to question the information you are being told.

Mommy - posted on 05/11/2011

328

18

2

The following is a transcription from Bill Maher's May 6th taping of Real Time with Bill Maher:
"Conspiracy theorists who are claiming that we didn’t really kill Bin Laden must be reminded that they didn’t think he did the crime in the first place. Come on nutjobs, keep your bullshit straight. The towers were brought down in a controlled demolition by George W. Bush to distract attention from Hawaii where CIA operatives were planting phony birth records so that a Kenyan named Obama could someday rise to power and pretend to take out the guy we pretended took out the towers. And I…and I know that’s true because I just got it in an email from Trump.”

Of course he was being facetious....I couldn't have said it better myself.

Sara - posted on 05/11/2011

9,313

50

586

I agree with Tammy. It's one thing not to believe everything you read or hear in the news, it's quite another to believe all this conspiracy theory bs...

Tammy - posted on 05/11/2011

1

0

4

I agree jakki but i dont see all the "hoax" stories adding up. Everyone has a different spin to it themselves. It doesnt make sense at all.. theyve added too much of their own opinion into it.

[deleted account]

There is sooooo much spin doctoring going on all the time, that we should all be suspicious of what we are told. There are vested interests busily creating tomorrow's "news" even as we speak. And don't get me started on Fox news.

Sara - posted on 05/11/2011

9,313

50

586

And you know what else makes me laugh? The people who claim these kinds of things to be true also criticize the gov't saying that they can't get anything done, they're ineffective, yada yada yada...but do you realize just how efficient the gov't would have to be, on many levels, to accomplish some of these conspiracies? Come on, people!

Iris - posted on 05/10/2011

1,993

29

51

It's because Obama is a muslim, he controls the muslims AND the Americans. He can totally pull this off!! =P

Seriously, no one is this powerful. To pull off a conspiracy like this is impossible.

Constance - posted on 05/10/2011

2,651

24

146

It is amasing how many true idiots there are in this world. Anybody that would come up with this list has entirely too much time on their hands.

Sara - posted on 05/10/2011

9,313

50

586

Conspiracy theorists who are claiming that we didn’t really kill Bin Laden must be reminded that they didn’t think he did the crime in the first place! Come on, nut jobs! Keep your bullshit straight! The towers were brought down in a controlled demolition by George W. Bush to distract attention from Hawaii where CIA operatives were planting phoney birth records so that a Kenyan named Obama could someday rise to power and pretend to take out the guy we pretended took out the towers. And I know that’s true because I just got it in an email from Trump.

Thank you Bill Maher.

Dana - posted on 05/10/2011

11,264

35

495

I don't even know what to say anymore....lol That video gave me a good chuckle though.

Tammy - posted on 05/10/2011

1

0

4

"When it comes to his birth certificate, I think we (Hawaii)were at least one place that didn't demand proof. Personally, that should have spoken volumes to the rest of the nation"

Thats a good point! I havent seen any news saying Hawaii saying his birth certificate IS A HOAX! [if anyone has seen the news then lets see what kinda news your tuning into]
I really think people saying its a lie just wanna find some kinda backfire for the "hoax"

Dana - posted on 05/10/2011

11,264

35

495

Tara, you realize that his wives are talking about his RECENT death by the seals- right? They're spilling a lot, and it's not just something being reported by the American or Western media.

Jennifer - posted on 05/10/2011

270

5

54

I don't need any videos. I don't need gruesome pictorial proof. I don't need the media. I don't need recollections of the night from the "neighbors." A lot of things are possible. Why, then, isn't it just possible that the raid really did happen? That they really did kill him? The subject itself has grown quite tiresome.
I believe the president when he says that he is dead. He doesn't really have any reason to lie about it. Some may think it's convienient for the poles, but, seriously, do you think he would be that desperate to lead a country who expected such a quick fix with the problems that Bush left behind and was so quick to pass judgement upon every decision? And it's not like he is in all mighty power over every choice, either. And the fact that there are already threats being made to the US? Well, that doesn't sound like a hoax to me.
When it comes to his birth certificate, I think we (Hawaii)were at least one place that didn't demand proof. Personally, that should have spoken volumes to the rest of the nation.

Tammy - posted on 05/10/2011

1

0

4

cool enough

but im skeptical about who's trying to cover what up



still isnt solid proof

just opinion vs opinion still

Tara - posted on 05/10/2011

2,567

14

114

Thanks for posting this. I've said it so many times, Bin Laden has been dead for a long long time. This is all so screwy and I can't believe that the American public is going to just allow these lies to be made without any accountability. Where is the accountability? Where is the solid proof? Where are the rebuttals to all the information that anyone can scour for, that proves there is a disinformation machine at work in the US, paid for by the US?? And when will people stop believing the "news" that is written more as propaganda than real news?
Thanks again for posting, great read.

Tammy - posted on 05/10/2011

1

0

4

And i just read what you posted lovely.
"Never said I believe this to all be true, but since you ask I will answer this way…
Government has lied to the American people time and time again or left out things they felt we did not need to know, or changed stories for some reason or another.."

I think the government hides things for a reason. We dont get secret and top secret clearences for nothing. The government isnt dumb..they know that their own people could rebel knowing the truth and something are best kept secret for the safety of military, or the US, or our government..(just take the raid of osama for example. We didnt know of that right? nor did pakistan) of everyone who chooses to live here you know?
Plus! If we all knew the truth then nothing about our government/military operations would be cool and interesting! You know?
Sometimes secrets are best kept for those who made them. Really..we dont need to know everything.

Tammy - posted on 05/10/2011

1

0

4

I think most of this is just a lot of people talking (like newspapers putting out opinions and people thinking its true) and not true words from the president or anyone that dealt with the raid. I really dont believe the SEAL team 6 did a hoax. Or was set up for a trick.. I dont think we're letting so many troops die overseas just so the president can feel better about himself. To me, its kinda crazy people do believe this. But people think IM crazy for believing and trusting the president ( i am military).

And you posted

6) Almost every single neighbor that lived near the alleged Bin Laden compound in Abbottabad that was interviewed by news reporters said with absolute certainty that they had never seen Bin Laden and that they knew of no evidence whatsoever to suggest he lived there. Since the town is a staging ground for the Pakistani military, which has a training facility situated virtually a stone’s throw away from the alleged Bin Laden compound, residents were required to show ID when they moved into the area. Pakistani troops and anti-terror police in the town refused to confirm that Bin Laden had lived in the house. Barack Obama himself admitted to 60 Minutes that the White House was only 55/45 sure that Osama lived there before the raid and this uncertainty prompted concerns that the US Navy SEALS sent in could have targeted a “prince from Dubai” or some other individual that was not Bin Laden



well i know this still isnt solid proof Bin laden was hiding out there but im not sure if you heard the story of Sohaib Athar who twittered what he heard and saw that night. He didnt see osama but he knew something was going on. And also if you stop to think that our president was lying...do you stop to think that Pakastani troops were trying to hide them? To me it would make sense since they DID get mad when we didnt inform them.

If i were them i would be a litte bit relieved that someone finally got him. But thats just me and my opinion..



but to add on i do believe that the president is trying his best to make us feel safe even though people shove silly things in his face like his birth certificate being a fake.

Either way ...someone is either falling for obamas tricks...or someone is falling for media tricks. I just hope this silly thing doesnt bring out a war between anyone else! We know now that Osama is dead! If he died a while ago or if he died in the raid EITHER WAY HE'S DEAD. thats the way i like to see it.



PLUS Thanks to Mr. President i got my full paycheck in april! Thanks to him the government didnt shut down! And people still want to call him a liar.

I know not everyone is religious..(im not) but what happened to having faith in someone who is making decisions to make us happy/ safe. you dont need to be religious to see that..

Jennifer - posted on 05/10/2011

270

5

54

I agree with Jenn. Could be just the name, though (kidding). But, seriously, I felt the same as she expressed all along.

Jenn - posted on 05/10/2011

2,683

36

96

It would make NO sense for them to have lied about his death. People who believe conspiracy theories are fuckin' WHACKED! Just sayin.

Desiree - posted on 05/10/2011

910

17

13

I can truely say that I could believe quite a bit of what was said in this post if it wasn't for the fact that I was taught:
Don't believe everything you hear and only half of what you see, do the research and make the choice for yourself.

Jennifer - posted on 05/10/2011

270

5

54

I guess I should also point out that I live in Hawaii, so if it wasn't a joke it would not be funny.

Jennifer - posted on 05/10/2011

270

5

54

Yes, Hawaii IS part of the USA. I only found that question funny because I decided to take it as a joke.

Dana - posted on 05/09/2011

11,264

35

495

Yes, I prefer to think of people as insane, it does have a better ring to it. ;)

♏*PHOENIX*♏ - posted on 05/09/2011

4,455

6

402

This is the base this is the foundation of why I think it is possible…

Join Circle of Moms

Sign up for Circle of Moms and be a part of this community! Membership is just one click away.

Join Circle of Moms